Analysis 69 (4):795-797 (2009)

Authors
Kimberly Morris
Midwestern State University
Abstract
This provocative, engaging and important book marks the fiftieth anniversary of the publication of Peter Winch's seminal The Idea of a Social Science . The authors – the first two philosophers, the third a sociologist – have worked together in various permutations before. No-one familiar with their previous publications will be surprised that the dominant voice throughout is Wittgenstein's – that is, Wittgenstein as read ‘resolutely’ by ‘new Wittgensteinians’. They have three principal aims: first, to read Winch's own work in an equally ‘resolute’ way; hence to read ISS as prophylactic and therapeutic in intention, and not as heralding a wonderful or not-so-wonderful new social theory; secondly, to defend Winch against certain persistent charges; and thirdly, to persuade social theorists and philosophers of ‘social science’ that Winch's therapeutic lessons have not yet been assimilated, with the possible exception of a handful of ethnographers and ethnomethodologists.Following a substantial introductory section, Chapters 1 and 2 – respectively, entitled ‘Beyond pluralism, monism, relativism, realism etc.: reassessing Peter Winch’ and ‘Winch and linguistic idealism’ – argue that Winch cannot be seen as an advocate of linguistic idealism or “any of the other ‘isms’ that have been reactively bandied about …
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/analys/anp105
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,634
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Iv. Understanding Peter Winch.W. W. Sharrock & R. J. Anderson - 1985 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 28 (1-4):119 – 122.
Winch Reassessed.John G. Gunnell - 2010 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (4):616-622.
Can Social Science Be Just?John Gilbert Gunnell - 2009 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (4):595-621.
Knowledge and Society.Arnold Levison - 1966 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 9 (1-4):132 – 146.
Winch’s Double-Edged Idea of a Social Science.Philip Pettit - 2000 - History of the Human Sciences 13 (1):63-77.
Mr. Louch's Idea of a Social Science.Peter Winch - 1964 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 7 (1-4):202-208.
The Very Idea of a Social Science.A. R. Louch - 1963 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 6 (1-4):273 – 286.
Peter Winch on Political Authority and Political Culture.Olli Lagerspetz - 2012 - Philosophical Investigations 35 (3-4):277-302.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-12-11

Total views
55 ( #210,127 of 2,533,674 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #389,210 of 2,533,674 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes