Philosophy East and West 39 (3):243-265 (1989)

Abstract
I examine three main objections to humor in western thought--That humor is hostile, That it is irrational, And that it is irresponsible. None of these, I show, Is a valid general objection to humor. I then explore some of the values of humor overlooked in western thought, Especially the way it gets us to see things in new ways and liberates us from practical concern. I contrast the western rejection of humor with the embracing of humor in zen, Showing the connection between the nonattachment emphasized in zen and the "distancing" in humor
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/1399447
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,466
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Not So Funny: A Deweyan Response.Cynthia Gayman - 2005 - Contemporary Pragmatism 2 (2):85-91.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
78 ( #123,900 of 2,374,863 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #204,926 of 2,374,863 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes