Facta Philosophica 10 (1/2):155--183 (2008)

Authors
Matteo Morganti
Università degli Studi Roma Tre
Abstract
Saunders' recent arguments in favour of the weak discernibility of (certain) quantum particles seem to be grounded in the 'generalist' view that science only provides general descriptions of the worlIn this paper, I introduce the ‘generalist’ perspective and consider its possible justification and philosophical basis; and then look at the notion of weak discernibility. I expand on the criticisms formulated by Hawley (2006) and Dieks and Veerstegh (2008) and explain what I take to be the basic problem: that the properties invoked by Saunders cannot be pointed to as ‘individuators’ of otherwise indiscernible (and thus numerically identical) entities because their ontological status remains underdetermined by the evidence and the established interpretation of the theory. In addition to to this, I suggest that Saunders does not deal adequately with bosons, and cannot do so exactly because he subscribes to PII and the generalist picture. The last part of the paper contains a critical examination of the claim (or at least implicit assumption) that the generalist picture should be regarded as obviously compelling by the modern-day empiricist.
Keywords discernibility  individuality  relations  generalism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.3726/93528_155
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Word and Object.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1960 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 17 (2):278-279.
The Problems of Philosophy.Bertrand Russell - 1912 - Home University Library.
Perception and Reason.Bill Brewer - 1999 - Oxford University Press.

View all 59 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Quality and Quantifiers.Jeffrey Sanford Russell - 2018 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (3):562-577.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Withering Away, Weakly.F. A. Muller - 2011 - Synthese 180 (2):223 - 233.
Weak Discernibility for Quanta, the Right Way.Nick Huggett & Josh Norton - 2014 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 65 (1):39-58.
Discerning Elementary Particles.F. A. Muller & M. P. Seevinck - 2009 - Philosophy of Science 76 (2):179-200.
Quantum Information Processing, Operational Quantum Logic, Convexity, and the Foundations of Physics.Howard Barnum - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34 (3):343-379.
Weak Discernibility.Katherine Hawley - 2006 - Analysis 66 (4):300–303.
Why Sibley is Not a Generalist After All.Anna Bergqvist - 2010 - British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (1):1-14.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-11-26

Total views
771 ( #7,723 of 2,448,343 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #33,327 of 2,448,343 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes