Which is it you want – equality or maternity leave?: Alabaster v. Barclays Bank p.l.c. and Secretary of State for Social Security  E.W.C.A Civ. 508,  I.R.L.R. 576
Feminist Legal Studies 14 (1):87-97 (2006)
AbstractIn Alabaster v. Barclays Bank plc and Secretary of State for Social Security (No. 2:  E.W.C.A Civ. 508,  I.R.L.R. 576.) Michelle Alabaster won a grand total of £204.53 (plus £65.86 interest) after eight years of litigation, which included two visits to the Court of Appeal and one to the European Court of Justice. This marathon resulted from the sex discrimination which Alabaster had alleged in relation to the calculation of her Statutory Maternity Pay (S.M.P.) whilst she was pregnant 10 years earlier. The technicalities of the statutory schemes involved should not be allowed to disguise the important principle which finally emerges in the Court of Appeal and which underlines one of the longstanding criticisms of the equality legislation, namely the requirement that a woman must compare herself with a man in order to establish unlawful sex discrimination
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Avoiding the 'Exquisite Trap': A Critical Look at the Equal Treatment/Special Treatment Debate in Law. [REVIEW]Julia Adiba Sohrab - 1993 - Feminist Legal Studies 1 (2):141-162.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
A Pregnant Pause: Federalism, Equality and the Maternity and Parental Leave Debate in Canada: Reference Re Employment Insurance , Ss.23 and 23, 2005 SCC 56. [REVIEW]Gillian Calder - 2006 - Feminist Legal Studies 14 (1):99-118.
Dancing on the Head of a Pin? Foetal Life and the European Convention.Barbara Hewson - 2005 - Feminist Legal Studies 13 (3):363-375.
Equality, Justice and Legitimacy in Selection.Matthew Clayton - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (1):8-30.
¿ De qué hablamos cuando hablamos de igualdad constitucional?Fernando Rey - 2011 - Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez 45:167 - 181.
Woman as Vulnerable Self: The Trope of Maternity in Levinas's Otherwise Than Being.Jennifer Rosato - 2012 - Hypatia 27 (2):348-365.
Adoption, ART, and a Re-Conception of the Maternal Body: Toward Embodied Maternity.Sarah-Vaughan Brakman & Sally J. Scholz - 2006 - Hypatia 21 (1):54-73.
Dignity, Discrimination, and Context: New Directions in South African and Canadian Human Rights Law. [REVIEW]Joan Small & Evadné Grant - 2005 - Human Rights Review 6 (2):25-63.
Towards Intersectionality in the European Court of Human Rights: The Case of B.S. V Spain. [REVIEW]Keina Yoshida - 2013 - Feminist Legal Studies 21 (2):195-204.
El derecho de la igualdad: Resolviendo conflictos de igualdad Y derechos humanos. La experiencia británica.Maleiha Malik - 2011 - Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez 45:109-146.
Multiple Biological Mothers: The Case for Gestation.Susan Feldman - 1992 - Journal of Social Philosophy 23 (1):98-104.
Beyond Couples: Burden V United Kingdom 47 EHRR 38;  2 FLR 787; Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights, 29 April 2008.Rosemary Auchmuty - 2009 - Feminist Legal Studies 17 (2):205-218.