Social Imaginaries 5 (1):57-80 (2019)

Authors
Gregory S. Moss
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Abstract
Carnap famously argued that metaphysics unavoidably involves a confusion between science and poetry. Unlike the lyric poet, who does not attempt to make an argument, the metaphysician attempts to make an argument while simultaneously lacking in musical talent. Carnap’s objection that metaphysics unavoidably involves a blend of philosophy and poetry is not a 20th century insight. Plato, in his beautifully crafted Phaedo, presents us with the imprisoned Socrates, who having been condemned to death for practicing philosophy in the Apology, has a dream in which he realizes that he ought to make music. In this dialogue, however, Plato indicates no hint of the scorn that Carnap has for metaphysics—rather Socrates’ friends find him setting Aesop’s fables to verse. In the modern era, Nietzsche re-introduced the ‘music making Socrates’ in his Birth of Tragedy. But Nietzsche is not the first to revive the concept in modern philosophy. Before Nietzsche’s call for a new music-making Socrates, the early German Romantics, in particular Schlegel, explicitly called for the identification of poetry and science in the concept of Poesie. As Schlegel writes: ‘Alle Kunst soll Wissenschaft werden, und alle Wissenschaft Kunst werden; Poesie und Philosophie sollen vereinigt sein.’ On the one hand, in Ion Socrates is not wrong to critique Ion for not knowing the significance of his own work. On the other hand, Socrates himself recognizes in Phaedo that he is guilty of failing to heed the call to make music. Long misunderstood, the Romantic concept of Poesie is not mere irrationalism, for it offers an aesthetic metaphysics of the Absolute. Romanticism is indeed a philosophy of the Absolute, but one which cannot conceive of any solution to the profound impasses that confront philosophical knowing except by learning to make music.
Keywords Continental Philosophy  Social and Political Philosophy  Social Science  Zeta Books
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 2393-2503
DOI 10.5840/si2019514
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,740
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Who is the "Music-Making Socrates"?Stefan Lorenz Sorgner - 2004 - Minerva - An Internet Journal of Philosophy 8 (1).
In Defense of Socrates.Francis C. Wade - 1971 - Review of Metaphysics 25 (2):311-325.
Is Make-Believe Only Reproduction?Michela Summa - 2019 - Social Imaginaries 5 (1):97-119.
Bildung and Paideia.Hu Jihua - 2017 - Dialogue and Universalism 27 (4):73-85.
Plato’s Dionysian Music?: A Reading of the Symposium.Jacob Howland - 2007 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 12 (1):17-47.
Plato’s Dionysian Music?: A Reading of the Symposium.Jacob Howland - 2007 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 12 (1):17-47.
The Dignity of Utopian Imagination.Mario Wenning - 2019 - Social Imaginaries 5 (1):181-198.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-08-17

Total views
4 ( #1,257,740 of 2,462,778 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,387 of 2,462,778 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes