Journal of Speculative Philosophy 28 (2):169-189 (2014)

Authors
Gregory S. Moss
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Abstract
Herein I investigate how four dogmas underpinning the traditional concepts of universality, the genus, class, and abstract universal, generate four paradoxes of self-reference. The four dogmas are the following: (1) that contradiction entails the total absence of determinacy, (2) the necessary finitude of the concept, (3) the separation of principles of universality and particularity, and (4) the necessity of appealing to foundations. In section III I show how these dogmas underpin the paradoxes of self-reference and how one cannot make progress on these paradoxes as long as these four dogmas are in place. Corresponding to the abovementioned dogmas are the four paradoxes of self-reference: (1a) the problem of the ..
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5325/jspecphil.28.2.0169
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,740
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-07-11

Total views
54 ( #201,972 of 2,462,780 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #101,756 of 2,462,780 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes