Four Paradoxes of Self-Reference: The Being of the Universal

Journal of Speculative Philosophy 28 (2):169-189 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Herein I investigate how four dogmas underpinning the traditional concepts of universality, the genus, class, and abstract universal, generate four paradoxes of self-reference. The four dogmas are the following: (1) that contradiction entails the total absence of determinacy, (2) the necessary finitude of the concept, (3) the separation of principles of universality and particularity, and (4) the necessity of appealing to foundations. In section III I show how these dogmas underpin the paradoxes of self-reference and how one cannot make progress on these paradoxes as long as these four dogmas are in place. Corresponding to the abovementioned dogmas are the four paradoxes of self-reference: (1a) the problem of the ..



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 84,152

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

62 (#212,634)

6 months
2 (#333,912)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gregory S. Moss
Chinese University of Hong Kong

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references