Big Data and Society 2 (2) (2015)

New methods to analyse social media data provide a powerful way to know publics and capture what they say and do. At the same time, access to these methods is uneven, with corporations and governments tending to have best access to relevant data and analytics tools. Critics raise a number of concerns about the implications dominant uses of data mining and analytics may have for the public: they result in less privacy, more surveillance and social discrimination, and they provide new ways of controlling how publics come to be represented and so understood. In this paper, we consider if a different relationship between the public and data mining might be established, one in which publics might be said to have greater agency and reflexivity vis-à-vis data power. Drawing on growing calls for alternative data regimes and practices, we argue that to enable this different relationship, data mining and analytics need to be democratised in three ways: they should be subject to greater public supervision and regulation, available and accessible to all, and used to create not simply known but reflexive, active and knowing publics. We therefore imagine conditions in which data mining is not just used as a way to know publics, but can become a means for publics to know themselves.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/2053951715611145
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,581
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Inclusion and Democracy.Iris Marion Young - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
Big Data From the Bottom Up.Alison Powell & Nick Couldry - 2014 - Big Data and Society 1 (2).

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Privacy Concerns in Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics.Isak Potgieter - 2020 - International Review of Information Ethics 28.
Data Mining: Proprietary Rights, People and Proposals.Cherie Courseault Trumbach Dinah Payne - 2009 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 18 (3):241-252.
Data Mining: Proprietary Rights, People and Proposals.Dinah Payne & Cherie Courseault Trumbach - 2009 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 18 (3):241-252.
Informational Privacy, Data Mining, and the Internet.Herman T. Tavani - 1999 - Ethics and Information Technology 1 (2):137-145.
KDD, Data Mining, and the Challenge for Normative Privacy.Herman T. Tavani - 1999 - Ethics and Information Technology 1 (4):265-273.


Added to PP index

Total views
2 ( #1,422,027 of 2,461,403 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #448,382 of 2,461,403 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes