Racial differences in sports: What's ethics got to do with it?
This paper is a critical review of Taboo: Why Black Athletes Dominate Sports and Why We’re Afraid to Talk About It by Jon Entine. It critically assesses the evidence that blacks do in fact dominate sports and attempts to show that this is an overgeneralization that perpetuates racist stereotypes. The tendency for both blacks and whites to accept such views creates expectations and beliefs that channel efforts in directions which reinforce historical stereotypes and limit opportunities for blacks to a limited range of activities and careers. Commitment to equal opportunity requires that evidence for racial differences in intellectual and athletic activities be subjected to a level of special scrutiny that Entine has failed to meet.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Talking a Good Game: Inquiries Into the Principles of Sport.Spencer K. Wertz - 1991 - Southern Methodist University Press.
Philosophical Perspectives on Gender in Sports.Paul Davis & Charlene Weaving (eds.) - 2010 - Routledge.
Racism: What It Is and What It Isn't.Lawrence Blum - 2002 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 21 (3):203-218.
Theology, Ethics, and Transcendence in Sports.S. J. Parry, Mark Nesti & Nick Watson (eds.) - 2010 - Routledge.
The Ontology of Sports Injuries.Yotam Lurie - 2002 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 16 (2):265-276.
Watching Sport: Aesthetics, Ethics and Emotion for the Spectator.Stephen Mumford - 2011 - Routledge.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads23 ( #218,570 of 2,168,639 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #346,816 of 2,168,639 )
How can I increase my downloads?