Rights in Criminal Law in the Light of a Will Theory

Criminal Justice Ethics 38 (3):176-197 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The will theory of rights has so far been considered incapable of capturing individual rights under criminal law. Adherents of the will theory, therefore, have defended the claim that criminal law does not assign rights to individuals. In this article I argue first, that criminal law does assign individual rights and second, that the will theory of rights may enhance our understanding of these rights. The two major implications of the account are: a volenti non fit iniuria principle for criminal law, and a theoretical framework for an idea of punishment as restitution.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,894

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-10-25

Downloads
61 (#387,144)

6 months
3 (#1,188,611)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Elias Moser
Karl Franzens University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Paternalism.Gerald Dworkin - 1972 - The Monist 56 (1):64-84.
Taking Rights Seriously.Ronald Dworkin - 1979 - Mind 88 (350):305-309.
The nature and value of rights.Joel Feinberg & Jan Narveson - 1970 - Journal of Value Inquiry 4 (4):243-260.
The expressive function of punishment.Joel Feinberg - 1965 - The Monist 49 (3):397–423.
The Morality of Law.Lon L. Fuller - 1964 - Ethics 76 (3):225-228.

View all 17 references / Add more references