Redundancy, Plasticity, and Detachment: The Implications of Comparative Genomics for Evolutionary Thinking

Philosophy of Science 73 (5):930-946 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Radically new or unexpected findings in a science demand an openness to new concepts and styles of explanation. The time is more than ripe for asking ourselves what we have learned from the research program of comparative genomics. Where not long ago the human genome was expected to reveal a close association of complexity with the quantitative expansion of the roster of unique genes, more recent findings, especially in relation to comparisons between human and chimp, have raised the bracing possibility that when it comes to complexity, it may be that `less is more'. But `less is more' is not the only observation or inference that follows from the data. The idea of `progressive detachment' will be introduced and set forth as the most perspicuous conceptual resource for unifying and interpreting the overall findings from comparative genomics to date.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,088

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Evolution of phenotypic plasticity: where are we going now?Massimo Pigliucci - 2005 - Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20 (9):481-486.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
74 (#208,006)

6 months
5 (#311,051)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lenny Moss
University of Exeter

References found in this work

What Genes Can't Do.Lenny Moss - 2003 - MIT Press.
What Genes Can’t Do.Lenny Moss - 2003 - Journal of the History of Biology 38 (2):383-384.
The Philosophy of Biology: An Episodic History.Marjorie Grene & David Depew - 2004 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by David J. Depew.

Add more references