The question of questions: What is a Gene? Comments on Rolston and Griffths & Stotz [Book Review]

Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (6):523-534 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX


If the question ``What is a gene?'' proves to be worth asking it must be able to elicit an answer which both recognizes and address the reasons why the concept of the gene ever seemed to be something worth getting excited about in the first place as well analyzing and evaluating the latest develops in the molecular biology of DNA. Each of the preceding papers fails to do one of these and sufferrs the consequences. Where Rolston responds to the apparent failure of molecular biology to make good on the desideratum of the classical gene by veering off into fanciful talk about ``cybernetic genes,'' Griffiths and Stotz lose themselves in the molecular fine print and forget to ask themselves why ``genes'' should be of any special interst anyway.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,088

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Are all genes regulatory genes?Rosario Michael Piro - 2011 - Biology and Philosophy 26 (4):595-602.
Genes made molecular.C. Kenneth Waters - 1994 - Philosophy of Science 61 (2):163-185.
Genes: Philosophical Analyses Put to the Test.Karola Stotz & Paul Griffiths - 2004 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 26 (1):5-28.
Are genes units of inheritance?Thomas Fogle - 1990 - Biology and Philosophy 5 (3):349-371.
What is a Gene? From molecules to metaphysics.Holmes Rolston - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (6):471-497.
Gene.Paul E. Griffiths & Karola Stotz - 2005 - In David L. Hull & Michael Ruse (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Philosophy of Biology. Cambridge University Press.


Added to PP

169 (#108,062)

6 months
3 (#550,572)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lenny Moss
University of Exeter

Citations of this work

Experimental philosophy of biology: notes from the field.Karola Stotz - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (2):233-237.
New Approach to Disease, Risk, and Boundaries Based on Emergent Probability.Patrick Daly - 2022 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 47 (3):457-481.
The Origin of Foresight.Martin Amsteus - 2012 - World Futures 68 (6):390 - 405.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The descent of man.Charles Darwin - 1874 - Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books. Edited by Michael T. Ghiselin.
What Genes Can't Do.Lenny Moss - 2003 - MIT Press.
Bacteria are small but not stupid: cognition, natural genetic engineering and socio-bacteriology.J. A. Shapiro - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (4):807-819.

View all 8 references / Add more references