Thinking and Reasoning 8 (3):205 – 224 (2002)
Using the matching bias example, the aim of the present studies was to show that adults' reasoning biases are due to faulty executive inhibition programming. In the first study, the subjects were trained on Wason's classical card selection task; half were given training in how to inhibit the perceptual matching bias (experimental group) and half in logic without the inhibition component (control group). On the pre- and post-tests, their performance was assessed on the Evans conditional rule falsification task (with a negation in the antecedent of the rule), a task that also involves matching bias. In addition, subjects were tested for perceptual field dependence/independence using the Embedded Figures Test. The results brought out a specific inhibition training effect, as well as a clear-cut relationship in the experimental group between receptiveness to training and perceptual field independence. In the second study, the training paradigm was the same except that on the pre- and post-tests, the negation was in the consequent of the conditional rule (in this case, the perceptual matching response corresponds to the logical response). The subjects succeeded on the pre-test, and the matching-bias inhibition training had a negative effect on post-test performance. This specific negative priming effect confirms the inhibitory impact of our experimental training and outlines the dissociation of inhibition and logical components.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Transitive Task Revisited: Investigating Key Hallmarks From the Start to the End of Training.Barlow Wright - 2006 - Thinking and Reasoning 12 (1):91 – 123.
How Reaction Time Measures Elucidate the Matching Bias and the Way Negations Are Processed.Jérôme Prado & Ira A. Noveck - 2006 - Thinking and Reasoning 12 (3):309 – 328.
Contrast Classes and Matching Bias as Explanations of the Effects of Negation on Conditional Reasoning.Mike Oaksford - 2002 - Thinking and Reasoning 8 (2):135 – 151.
Matching Bias and Set Sizes: A Discussion of Yama (2001).Jonathan St B. T. Evans - 2002 - Thinking and Reasoning 8 (2):153 – 163.
Matching Bias in Conditional Reasoning: Do We Understand It After 25 Years?Jonathan St B. T. Evans - 1998 - Thinking and Reasoning 4 (1):45 – 110.
Matching Versus Optimal Data Selection in the Wason Selection Task.Hiroshi Yama - 2001 - Thinking and Reasoning 7 (3):295 – 311.
Matching Bias in the Selection Task is Not Eliminated by Explicit Negations.Edgar Erdfelder, Karl Christoph Klauer & Christoph Stahl - 2008 - Thinking and Reasoning 14 (3):281-303.
Judgement Under Uncertainty and Conjunction Fallacy Inhibition Training.Sylvain Moutier & Olivier Houd - 2003 - Thinking and Reasoning 9 (3):185 – 201.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads51 ( #103,717 of 2,178,180 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #316,504 of 2,178,180 )
How can I increase my downloads?