Empirical Methods in Animal Ethics

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (5):853-866 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article the predominant, purely theoretical perspectives on animal ethics are questioned and two important sources for empirical data in the context of animal ethics are discussed: methods of the social and methods of the natural sciences. Including these methods can lead to an empirical animal ethics approach that is far more adapted to the needs of humans and nonhuman animals and more appropriate in different circumstances than a purely theoretical concept solely premised on rational arguments. However, the potential tension between lay people’s moral judgements and ethical theory must be handled with care. The thorough analysis of qualitative data can lead to a deep insight into e.g. ethical problems with the application of laws and guidelines, practicality issues with ethical theories, personal ambivalence, and cognitive biases. The interaction between animal ethics theory and empirical findings can lead to both a more context-sensitive and applicable ethical theory and a less arbitrary folk moral system. Findings from the natural sciences can also contribute valuable information to animal ethics theory—the more we know about the properties and preferences of nonhuman animals the better we can respect them. Here, however, it is vital not to justify invasive procedures for the sake of “ethical progress”. It might be ethically required to forego some scientific findings about nonhuman animals if it is not clear how much a procedure would harm them. Only with robust empirical methods will light ultimately be shed on the nature of our moral relationship with animals

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 98,109

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Empirical Methods in Animal Ethics.Kirsten Persson & David Shaw - 2015 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (5):853-866.
Deliberating Animal Values: a Pragmatic—Pluralistic Approach to Animal Ethics.Frank Kupper & Tjard Cock Buning - 2011 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (5):431-450.
Animal Ethics and the Scientific Study of Animals.David Fraser & Rod Preece - 2004 - Essays in Philosophy 5 (2):404-417.
Animal Ethics Based on Friendship.Barbro Frööding & Martin Peterson - 2011 - Journal of Animal Ethics 1 (1):58-69.
Animals and Business Ethics.Maris Beck - 2023 - Journal of Animal Ethics 13 (2):195-202.
Just Fodder: The Ethics of Feeding Animals.Josh Milburn - 2022 - Chicago: McGill-Queen's University Press.
The role of ethical reflection and dialogue in conceptualising animal welfare.Simon Coghlan - 2022 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 35 (3):1-17.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-05-07

Downloads
31 (#592,519)

6 months
2 (#1,687,031)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Per Sandin
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

References found in this work

The ethical project.Philip Kitcher - 2011 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Experimental philosophy.Joshua Knobe - 2007 - The Philosophers' Magazine 50:72-73.
The Two Sources of Moral Standing.Justin Sytsma & Edouard Machery - 2012 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 3 (3):303-324.

View all 20 references / Add more references