Abstract
This article argues that John Rawls' liberal philosophising is an inadequate means of facing today's varied social and political challenges, both domestic and international, because it is incapable of grasping the antagonistic dimension which is constitutive of the political. Focusing first on Rawls' conception of politics in a well-ordered liberal society, and thereafter on his arguments pertaining to the field of international politics, it is shown how Rawls forecloses the recognition of the properly political moment by postulating that the discrimination between what is legitimate and what is not legitimate is dictated by morality and rationality. With exclusions presented as rationally justified and with the antagonistic dimension of politics whisked away, liberalism appears as the truly moral and rational solution to the problem of how to organise human coexistence, and its universalisation becomes the aim of all those who are moved by moral and rational considerations. Against this conception, it is suggested that a future, more peaceful world would be less a cosmopolitan and more a pluralist one.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.3167/th.2009.5611802
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,688
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Limits of John Rawls' Pluralism.Chantal Mouffe - 2009 - Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 56 (118):1-14.
The Limits of John Rawls’s Pluralism.Chantal Mouffe - 2005 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 4 (2):221-231.
On John Rawls and Public Reason.Jonah David Murdock - 1998 - Dissertation, Northwestern University
The Idea of a Political Liberalism: Essays on Rawls.Victoria Davion & Clark Wolf (eds.) - 1999 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Enlightenment Liberalism and the Challenge of Pluralism.Matthew Jones - 2012 - Dissertation, Canterbury Christ Church University
Liberalism, Political Pluralism, and International Justice.Hahn Hsu - 1998 - Dissertation, The Ohio State University
John Rawls: Towards a Just World Order.Patrick Hayden - 2002 - University of Wales Press.
Civic Respect, Political Liberalism, and Non-Liberal Societies.Blain Neufeld - 2005 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 4 (3):275-299.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-02-20

Total views
5 ( #1,111,038 of 2,349,537 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #510,673 of 2,349,537 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes