Phronesis 50 (3):232-249 (2005)
The present study partly supports, partly corrects, and partly complements recent discussions of Arius Didymus fr. 23 and fr. 25 Diels, Aetius I, 20, 1 and Sextus Empiricus AM X, 3-4 = PH III, 124. It proposes a comprehensive interpretation of the first text (A.I), defends the attribution of its content to Zeno of Citium (A.II), interprets the Stoic definitions of space, place and void to be found in the other sources (B.I) and again vindicates the attribution of the core definitions to Zeno (B.II). The central methodological principle is the presumption of innocence for sources.The main conclusions of (A) are: 1. Arius Didymus' fr. 23 deals only with the coherence and the structure of the cosmos, not with its immobility; 2. The coherence of the cosmos, as that of any object, is determined by its hexis which pushes its parts towards its centre; 3. The structure of the cosmos, its stratification into the four concentric spheres of the elements, is determined by the combined effect of (a) the thrust downwards they all undergo from the cosmos' hexis; (b) their own natural weight or lightness and (c) the relative quantitative values of these weights or lightnesses; 4. The reasons adduced against Zeno's authorship are not based on the evidence but on the now prevalent disparaging sceptical approach towards Stobaeus' way of excerpting from Arius.The main conclusions of (B) are: 1. There is no deep contradiction between the various de finitions of space ascribed by our sources to Zeno, Chrysippus and the Stoics in general: what Chrysippus denied was the form of the de finition attributed to Zeno by Aetius, not the concept de fined, even though this form seems to have prevailed later in the school; 2. There is no good reason therefore to question its ascription to Zeno as some modern researchers have done; 3. Here again the error is due to a predominantly sceptical approach towards the reliability of our sources
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Rethinking the Presumption of Innocence.Victor Tadros - 2007 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 1 (2):193-213.
The Prosecutor and the Presumption of Innocence.Richard L. Lippke - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (2):337-352.
Reasonable Doubt and the Presumption of Innocence: The Case of the Bayesian Juror.Piers Rawling - 1999 - Topoi 18 (2):117-126.
Could the Presumption of Innocence Protect the Guilty?Patrick Tomlin - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (2):431-447.
The Ongoing Soviet Debate About the Presumption of Innocence.George P. Fletcher - 1984 - Criminal Justice Ethics 3 (1):69-75.
Extending the Golden Thread? Criminalisation and the Presumption of Innocence.Patrick Tomlin - 2013 - Journal of Political Philosophy 21 (1):44-66.
It Wasn't How It Seemed: Short Stories About People Who Jumped to Conclusions.Yehudis Samet - 2000 - Mesorah Publications.
A Physical Interpretation of the Universe: The Doctrines of Zeno the Stoic.Harold Arthur Kinross Hunt - 1976 - Melbourne University Press.
The Universe Around Them: Cosmology and Cosmic Renewal in Indianized South-East Asia.H. G. Quaritch Wales - 1977 - A. Probsthain.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads20 ( #242,936 of 2,153,860 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #279,759 of 2,153,860 )
How can I increase my downloads?