Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (1):113-137 (2013)

Authors
Deborah Mower
University of Mississippi
Abstract
Situationist research in social psychology focuses on the situational factors that influence behavior. Doris and Harman argue that this research has powerful implications for ethics, and virtue ethics in particular. First, they claim that situationist research presents an empirical challenge to the moral psychology presumed within virtue ethics. Second, they argue that situationist research supports a theoretical challenge to virtue ethics as a foundation for ethical behavior and moral development. I offer a response from moral psychology using an interpretation of Xunzi—a Confucian virtue ethicist from the Classical period. This Confucian account serves as a foil to the situationist critique in that it uncovers many problematic ontological and normative assumptions at work in this debate regarding the prediction and explanation of behavior, psychological posits, moral development, and moral education. Xunzi’s account of virtue ethics not only responds to the situationist empirical challenge by uncovering problematic assumptions about moral psychology, but also demonstrates that it is not a separate empirical hypothesis. Further, Xunzi’s virtue ethic responds to the theoretical challenge by offering a new account of moral development and a ground for ethical norms that fully attends to situational features while upholding robust character traits.
Keywords Situationism  Confucian  Virtue ethics  Moral development  Xunzi  Character traits  Moral psychology  Ritual  Doris  Harman
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10677-011-9312-9
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 52,956
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Mind, Value, and Reality.John Henry McDowell - 1998 - Harvard University Press.
Virtue and Reason.John McDowell - 1979 - The Monist 62 (3):331-350.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Meditation and the Cultivation of Virtue.Candace Upton - 2017 - Philosophical Psychology 30 (4):373-394.
Ritual Education and Moral Development: A Comparison of Xunzi and Vygotsky.Colin Lewis - 2018 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 17 (1):81-98.
Early Confucianism and Contemporary Moral Psychology.Richard Kim - 2016 - Philosophy Compass 11 (9):473-485.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Scripting Situations in Moral Education.Deborah S. Mower - 2010 - Teaching Ethics 11 (1):93-106.
Identifying and Defending the Hard Core of Virtue Ethics.Mark Alfano - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Research 38:233-260.
The Possibility of Virtue.Miguel Alzola - 2012 - Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (2):377-404.
Character and Moral Psychology.Christian B. Miller - 2014 - Oxford University Press.
Harman Vs. Virtue Theory.Chris Tucker - 2004 - Southwest Philosophy Review 21 (1):137-145.
The Problem of Character.Christian Miller - 2014 - In van Hooft Stan (ed.), The Handbook of Virtue Ethics. Acumen Publishing. pp. 418-429.
Social Psychology and Virtue Ethics.Christian Miller - 2003 - The Journal of Ethics 7 (4):365-392.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-11-09

Total views
183 ( #48,056 of 2,343,862 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #39,933 of 2,343,862 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes