Waarom ergeren theologen zich aan John Hick?

Bijdragen 71 (2):159-179 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The pluralist hypothesis as popularised by John Hick, which postulates the rough equality of religious traditions, has gained wide approval especially within interreligious circles. Nonetheless, Hick remains one of the most contested philosophers of religion of the twentieth century. Most notably, theologians have been highly critical; their polemical reactions to his pluralist hypothesis reveal their irritation. The question is: from where does this irritation arise? Why are these theologians so offended by a philosopher? How are we to understand the polemics that have arisen in response to Hick’s pluralism? In this article I suggest that the controversy surrounding Hick’s pluralist hypothesis relates to the way he develops his philosophical reflections in a theological direction. There is something wrong with the way he divides the roles between philosophy and theology. I regard the discussion, which emerged from Hicks philosophy of religion as a prototype for a reflection on the complex relation between both disciplines



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Religious Ambiguity in Hick’s Religious Pluralism.Amir Dastmalchian - 2009 - International Journal of Hekmat 1:75-89.
A Response to John Hick.George I. Mavrodes - 1997 - Faith and Philosophy 14 (3):289-294.
God, truth, and reality: essays in honour of John Hick.John Hick & Arvind Sharma (eds.) - 1993 - New York, N.Y.: St. Martin's Press.
A John Hick reader.John Hick - 1990 - Philadelphia: Trinity Press International. Edited by Paul Badham.
Death and Eternal Life.John Hick - 1976 - London: Collins.
John Hick’s Soul-Making Theodicy and the Virtue of Love.Eric Silverman - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Research 34:329-343.
[Hick, Necessary Being, and the Cosmological Argument] Comment.John H. Hick - 1972 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 1 (4):485 - 487.
The many gods of Hick and Mavrodes.William Hasker - 2011 - In Kelly James Clark & Raymond J. VanArragon (eds.), Evidence and Religious Belief. Oxford University Press.
John Hick’s Pluralism.Bernd Irlenborn - 2011 - Philosophy and Theology 23 (2):267-280.


Added to PP

15 (#923,100)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references