Toward an Ethically Sensitive Implementation of Noninvasive Prenatal Screening in the Global Context
Jessica Mozersky, Vardit Ravitsky, Rayna Rapp, Marsha Michie, Subhashini Chandrasekharan & Megan Allyse
Hastings Center Report 47 (2):41-49 (2017)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Noninvasive prenatal screening using cell-free DNA, which analyzes placental DNA circulating in maternal blood to provide information about fetal chromosomal disorders early in pregnancy and without risk to the fetus, has been hailed as a potential “paradigm shift” in prenatal genetic screening. Commercial provision of cell-free DNA screening has contributed to a rapid expansion of the tests included in the screening panels. The tests can include screening for sex chromosome anomalies, rare subchromosomal microdeletions and aneuploidies, and most recently, the entire fetal genome. The benefits of this screening tool are generally framed, by both providers and commercial laboratories, as enhancing reproductive autonomy and choice by providing an earlier, simpler, and more accurate screening while potentially reducing the need for invasive follow-up testing. The majority of the literature has explored these issues empirically or conceptually from a European or North American vantage point, one that assumes normative priorities such as individual reproductive autonomy and the clinical availability of maternal health care or prenatal screening programs within which cell-free DNA screening is offered. While its implementation has raised both challenges and opportunities, very little is known about real-world experiences and the implications of the rapid introduction of cell-free DNA screening outside of North America and Europe, especially in low- and middle-income countries. To begin addressing this gap in knowledge, we organized a four-day international workshop to explore the ethical, legal, social, economic, clinical, and practical implications of the global expansion of cell-free DNA screening. We describe eight key insights that arose from the workshop.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1002/hast.690 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Imagining Oneself Otherwise.Catriona Mackenzie - 2000 - In Catriona Mackenzie & Natalie Stoljar (eds.), Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self. Oup Usa.
Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self.Sue Campbell - 2002 - Hypatia 17 (2):165-168.
Elucidating the Concept of Vulnerability: Layers Not Labels.Florencia Luna - 2009 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 2 (1):121-139.
Reconceptualizing Autonomy: A Relational Turn in Bioethics.Bruce Jennings - 2016 - Hastings Center Report 46 (3):11-16.
A Disability Critique of the New Prenatal Test for Down Syndrome.Chris Kaposy - 2013 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 23 (4):299-324.
View all 9 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
The Shifting Landscape of Prenatal Testing: Between Reproductive Autonomy and Public Health.Vardit Ravitsky - 2017 - Hastings Center Report 47 (s3):S34-S40.
Women’s Perspectives on the Ethical Implications of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing: A Qualitative Analysis to Inform Health Policy Decisions.Meredith Vanstone, Alexandra Cernat, Jeff Nisker & Lisa Schwartz - 2018 - BMC Medical Ethics 19 (1):27.
Seeing Beyond the Margins: Challenges to Informed Inclusion of Vulnerable Populations in Research.Sarah Gehlert & Jessica Mozersky - 2018 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 46 (1):30-43.
Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Decision Making Regarding Noninvasive Prenatal Testing: A Comparative Study of Lebanon and Quebec.Hazar Haidar, Meredith Vanstone, Anne-Marie Laberge, Gilles Bibeau, Labib Ghulmiyyah & Vardit Ravitsky - 2018 - Ajob Empirical Bioethics 9 (2):99-111.
Sex Selection and Global Gender Justice.Agomoni Ganguli-Mitra - 2021 - Journal of Social Philosophy 52 (2):217-233.
View all 6 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Challenging the Rhetoric of Choice in Prenatal Screening.Victoria Seavilleklein - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (1):68-77.
Prenatal Screening: An Ethical Agenda for the Near Future.Antina Jong & Guido M. W. R. Wert - 2015 - Bioethics 29 (1):46-55.
Prenatal Screening: Current Practice, New Developments, Ethical Challenges.Antina Jong, Idit Maya & Jan M. M. Lith - 2015 - Bioethics 29 (1):1-8.
Bioethical Concepts in Theory and Practice: An Exploratory Study of Prenatal Screening in Iceland. [REVIEW]Helga Gottfreðsdóttir & Vilhjálmur Árnason - 2011 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 14 (1):53-61.
A New Era in Prenatal Testing: Are We Prepared? [REVIEW]Dagmar Schmitz - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (3):357-364.
Genetic Screening and Ethics: European Perspectives.Ruth Chadwick, Henk ten Have, Jfrgen Husted, Mairi Levitt, Tony McGleenan, Darren Shickle & Urban Wiesing - 1998 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (3):255 – 273.
Prenatal Screening, Reproductive Choice, and Public Health.Stephen Wilkinson - 2015 - Bioethics 29 (1):26-35.
First Trimester Down Syndrome Screening is Less Effective and the Number of Invasive Procedures is Increased in Women Younger Than 35 Years of Age.Sini Peuhkurinen, Paivi Laitinen, Markku Ryynanen & Jaana Marttala - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (2):324-326.
Ethical Issues Related to Screening for Preeclampsia.Jennifer M. Jørgensen, Paula L. Hedley, Mickey Gjerris & Michael Christiansen - 2014 - Bioethics 28 (7):360-367.
A New Ethical Landscape of Prenatal Testing: Individualizing Choice to Serve Autonomy and Promote Public Health: A Radical Proposal.Christian Munthe - 2015 - Bioethics 29 (1):36-45.
Public Policy Implications of Human Genetic Technology: Genetic Screening.Robert H. Blank - 1982 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7 (4):355-374.
Pre-Employment Genetic Screening.[author unknown] - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (4):420-420.
Antenatal Screening and its Possible Meaning From Unborn Baby's Perspective.Sahin Aksoy - 2001 - BMC Medical Ethics 2 (1):1-11.
Can Safety Assurance Procedures in the Food Industry Be Used to Evaluate a Medical Screening Programme? The Application of the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point System to an Antenatal Serum Screening Programme for Down's Syndrome. Stage 2: Overcoming the Hazards in Programme Delivery.M. Clare Derrington, Elizabeth S. Draper, Ronald T. Hsu & Jennifer J. Kurinczuk - 2003 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 9 (1):49-57.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2017-03-17
Total views
18 ( #611,110 of 2,519,652 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #271,073 of 2,519,652 )
2017-03-17
Total views
18 ( #611,110 of 2,519,652 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #271,073 of 2,519,652 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads