Concern for families and individuals in clinical genetics

Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (2):70-73 (2003)

Authors
Abstract
Clinical geneticists are increasingly confronted with ethical tensions between their responsibilities to individual patients and to other family members. This paper considers the ethical implications of a “familial” conception of the clinical genetics role. It argues that dogmatic adherence to either the familial or to the individualistic conception of clinical genetics has the potential to lead to significant harms and to fail to take important obligations seriously.Geneticists are likely to continue to be required to make moral judgments in the resolution of such tensions and may find it useful to have access to ethics training and support
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.29.2.70
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,413
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Family Covenant and Genetic Testing.David J. Doukas & Jessica W. Berg - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (3):2 – 10.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Holism and Reductionism: A View From Genetics.Arthur Zucker - 1981 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 6 (2):145-164.
On Evoking Clinical Meaning.Richard Zaner - 2006 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (6):655 – 666.
A Foucauldian Foray Into the New Genetics.Marilyn E. Coors - 2003 - Journal of Medical Humanities 24 (3-4):279-289.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-24

Total views
9 ( #830,896 of 2,291,812 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #825,549 of 2,291,812 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature