Incorporation of phylogeny in biological diversity measurement: Drawbacks of extensively used indices, and advantages of quadratic entropy

Bioessays 33 (11):819-822 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Graphical AbstractUsing the indices δ+ and δ* for assessing phylogenetic diversity may lead to spurious results and interpretations; it can bias recommendations for conservation and lead to inappropriate management decisions. Therefore these indices should be avoided and other indices based on quadratic entropy (Qδ+ and Q) should be used instead.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Barriers to Change.Gerald McLaughlin, Josetta McLaughlin & Jacqueline McLaughlin - 2012 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 23:309-321.
Does the Bohm theory solve the measurement problem?Abraham D. Stone - 1994 - Philosophy of Science 61 (2):250-266.
A semantic taxonomy for diversity measures.Carlo Ricotta - 2007 - Acta Biotheoretica 55 (1):23-33.
Entropy - A Guide for the Perplexed.Roman Frigg & Charlotte Werndl - 2011 - In Claus Beisbart & Stephan Hartmann (eds.), Probabilities in Physics. Oxford University Press. pp. 115-142.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-28

Downloads
24 (#620,575)

6 months
5 (#544,079)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?