On Vít Gvoždiak's “John Searle's Theory of Sign”

Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 22 (2):255-261 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Vít Gvoždiak published a reconciliatory analysis of Searle’s social ontology with semiotics in Gvoždiak (2012). Without prior knowledge of his paper, an analysis of the same subject appeared in Msimang (2014). Even though Searle’s social ontology is a common point of reference in the formulation of semiotics in these papers, it also serves as a point of departure in their understanding of semiotics and its development. The semiotic theory expressed in Gvoždiak (2012) is an inherently linguistic (speech act centred) theory, whereas the semiotic theory presented in Msimang (2014) tends more towards a general theory of communicative systems in which social ontology, which follows from speech act theory, is an interesting part. It is my purpose in this note to contrast the two positions of semiotic theory as they appear in the aforementioned papers in reference to their appropriation of Searle’s social ontology.



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

275 (#77,273)

6 months
49 (#93,214)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Phila M. Msimang
University of Stellenbosch

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Varieties of Reference.Gareth Evans - 1982 - Oxford: Oxford University Press. Edited by John Henry McDowell.
Word and Object.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1960 - Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
Two Dogmas of Empiricism.W. Quine - 1951 - [Longmans, Green].
Mind and World.John Henry McDowell - 1994 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
From a Logical Point of View.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1953 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

View all 131 references / Add more references