Trust in Nanotechnology? On Trust as Analytical Tool in Social Research on Emerging Technologies

NanoEthics 5 (1):15-28 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Trust has become an important aspect of evaluating the relationship between lay public and technology implementation. Experiences have shown that a focus on trust provides a richer understanding of reasons for backlashes of technology in society than a mere focus of public understanding of risks and science communication. Therefore, trust is also widely used as a key concept for understanding and predicting trust or distrust in emerging technologies. But whereas trust broadens the scope for understanding established technologies with well-defined questions and controversies, it easily fails to do so with emerging technologies, where there are no shared questions, a lack of public familiarity with the technology in question, and a restricted understanding amongst social researchers as to where distrust is likely to arise and how and under which form the technology will actually be implemented. Rather contrary, ‘trust’ might sometimes even direct social research into fixed structures that makes it even more difficult for social research to provide socially robust knowledge. This article therefore suggests that if trust is to maintain its important role in evaluating emerging technologies, the approach has to be widened and initially focus not on people’s motivations for trust, but rather the object of trust it self, as to predicting how and where distrust might appear, how the object is established as an object of trust, and how it is established in relation with the public

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,075

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Creating Trust.Robert C. Solomon - 1998 - Business Ethics Quarterly 8 (2):205-232.
How to Trust a Molecule? The Case of Cyclodextrins Entering the Nanorealm.Sacha Loeve & Mickaël Normand - 2011 - In Torben B. Zülsdorf, Christopher Coenen, Ulrich Fiedeler, Arianna Ferrari, Colin Milburn & Matthia Wienroth (eds.), Quantum Engagements. Social Reflections of Nanoscience and Emerging Technologies. IOS Press.
Trusting Our Selves to Technology.Asle H. Kiran & Peter-Paul Verbeek - 2010 - Knowledge, Technology & Policy 23 (3):409-427.
Public Trust.Cynthia Townley & Jay L. Garfield - 2013 - In Cynthia Townley & P. Maleka (eds.), Trust: Analytic and Applied Perspectives. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Hype and Public Trust in Science.Zubin Master & David B. Resnik - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):321-335.
Technology and the management of trust in insurance medicine.Klasien Horstman - 2000 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (1):39-61.
Can we trust robots?Mark Coeckelbergh - 2012 - Ethics and Information Technology 14 (1):53-60.
Trust: self-interest and the common good.Marek Kohn - 2008 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Making the Technological Trustworthy.S. D. Noam Cook - 2010 - Knowledge, Technology & Policy 23 (3):455-459.
On the attitude of trust.Lars Hertzberg - 1988 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 31 (3):307 – 322.
Puzzles about Trust.Doran Smolkin - 2008 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 46 (3):431-449.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-23

Downloads
99 (#175,512)

6 months
9 (#309,818)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?