Semantics revisited, or how not to talk about robot cats and blue Lemons

Metaphilosophy 4 (1):54–62 (1973)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9973.1973.tb00502.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,162
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Reference and Definite Descriptions.Keith S. Donnellan - 1966 - Philosophical Review 75 (3):281-304.
Is Semantics Possible?Hilary Putnam - 1970 - Metaphilosophy 1 (3):187–201.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
There is No 'I' in 'Robot': Robots and Utilitarianism (Expanded & Revised).Christopher Grau - 2011 - In Susan Anderson & Michael Anderson (eds.), Machine Ethics. Cambridge University Press. pp. 451.
The March of the Robot Dogs.Robert Sparrow - 2002 - Ethics and Information Technology 4 (4):305-318.
Intentionality.Alex Byrne - forthcoming - In J. Pfeifer & Sahotra Sarkar (eds.), The Philosophy of Science: An Encyclopedia. Routledge.
The Mad Scientist Meets the Robot Cats: Compatibilism, Kinds, and Counterexamples.M. Heller - 1996 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56 (2):333-37.
Martian Unicorns of Blue Cats? An Essay on Philosophical Method.Arthur F. Holmes - 1963 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 24 (1):135-142.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

8 ( #483,542 of 2,152,251 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #399,478 of 2,152,251 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums