Semantics revisited, or how not to talk about robot cats and blue Lemons

Metaphilosophy 4 (1):54–62 (1973)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9973.1973.tb00502.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,781
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Reference and Definite Descriptions.Keith S. Donnellan - 1966 - Philosophical Review 75 (3):281-304.
Is Semantics Possible?Hilary Putnam - 1970 - Metaphilosophy 1 (3):187–201.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
There is No 'I' in 'Robot': Robots and Utilitarianism (Expanded & Revised).Christopher Grau - 2011 - In Susan Anderson & Michael Anderson (eds.), Machine Ethics. Cambridge University Press. pp. 451.
The March of the Robot Dogs.Robert Sparrow - 2002 - Ethics and Information Technology 4 (4):305-318.
Intentionality.Alex Byrne - forthcoming - In J. Pfeifer & Sahotra Sarkar (eds.), The Philosophy of Science: An Encyclopedia. Routledge.
The Mad Scientist Meets the Robot Cats: Compatibilism, Kinds, and Counterexamples.M. Heller - 1996 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56 (2):333-37.
Martian Unicorns of Blue Cats? An Essay on Philosophical Method.Arthur F. Holmes - 1963 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 24 (1):135-142.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
9 ( #475,566 of 2,199,428 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #299,438 of 2,199,428 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature