Journal of Business Ethics 108 (3):347-359 (2012)

This study examined some ethical implications of two different individual competitive orientations. Winning is crucially important in hypercompetitiveness , whereas a personal development (PD) perspective considers competition as a means to self-discovery and self-improvement. In a sample of 263 senior-level undergraduate business students, survey results suggested that hypercompetitiveness was generally associated with “poor ethics” and PD competitiveness was linked with “high ethics”. For example, hypercompetitive individuals generally saw nothing wrong with self-interested gain at the expense of others, but PD competitors viewed such activities as largely inappropriate. Hypercompetitive people also tended to be highly Machiavellian but not ethically idealistic. In contrast, PD competitors tended to be ethically idealistic but not Machiavellian. Managers that are interested in both high ethics and high functioning work groups may wish to consider the potential importance of attempting to channel hypercompetitive tendencies into PD directions.
Keywords Competitiveness  Ethical judgments  Machiavellianism  Idealism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10551-011-1094-4
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,579
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Vicious Competitiveness and the Desire to Win.Eric Gilbertson - 2016 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 43 (3):409-423.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
39 ( #280,944 of 2,461,809 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #448,803 of 2,461,809 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes