Erkenntnis 48 (1):81 - 99 (1998)
AbstractQuine claims that holism (i.e., the Quine-Duhem thesis) prevents us from defining synonymy and analyticity (section 2). In "Word and Object," he dismisses a notion of synonymy which works well even if holism is true. The notion goes back to a proposal from Grice and Strawson and runs thus: R and S are synonymous iff for all sentences T we have that the logical conjunction of R and T is stimulus-synonymous to that of S and T. Whereas Grice and Strawson did not attempt to defend this definition, I try to show that it indeed gives us a satisfactory account of synonymy. Contrary to Quine, the notion is tighter than stimulus-synonymy -- particularly when applied to sentences with less than critical semantic mass (section 3). Now according to Quine, analyticity could be defined in terms of synonymy, if synonymy were to make sense: A sentence is analytic iff synonymous to self-conditionals. This leads us to the following notion of analyticity: S is analytic iff, for all sentences T, the logical conjunction of S and T is stimulus-synonymous to T; an analytic sentence does not change the semantic mass of any theory to which it may be conjoined (section 4). This notion is tighter than Quine's stimulus-analyticity; unlike stimulus-analyticity, it does not apply to those sentences from the very center of our theories which can be assented to come what may, even though they are not synthetic in the intuitive sense (section 5).
Similar books and articles
Does the quine/duhem thesis prevent us from defining analyticity?Olaf Mueller - 1998 - Erkenntnis 48 (1):85-104.
From within and from without. Two perspectives on analytic sentences.Olaf L. Müller - 2002 - In Wolfram Hinzen & Hans Rott (eds.), Belief and meaning: Essays at the interface. Deutsche Bibliothek der Wissenschaften.
From a Phono-Logical Point of View: Neutralizing Quine’s Argument Against Analyticity.Reese M. Heitner - 2006 - Synthese 150 (1):15-39.
Implicit thoughts: Quine, Frege and Kant on analytic propositions.Verena Mayer - 2003 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 66 (1):61-90.
Quine, analyticity and philosophy of mathematics.John P. Burgess - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (214):38–55.
The bifurcation of scientific theories and indeterminacy of translation.Donald Hockney - 1975 - Philosophy of Science 42 (4):411-427.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Innen und außen: zwei Perspektiven auf analytische Sätze.Olaf L. Müller - 2008 - Philosophia Naturalis 45 (1):5-35.
References found in this work
No references found.