Prismatic Equivalence – A New Case of Underdetermination: Goethe vs. Newton on the Prism Experiments


Authors
Olaf L. Müller
Humboldt-University, Berlin
Abstract
Goethe's objections to Newton's theory of light and colours are better than often acknowledged. You can accept the most important elements of these objections without disagreeing with Newton about light and colours. As I will argue, Goethe exposed a crucial weakness of Newton's methodological self-assessment. Newton believed that with the help of his prism experiments, he could prove that sunlight was composed of variously coloured rays of light. Goethe showed that this step from observation to theory is more problematic than Newton wanted to admit. By insisting that the step to theory is not forced upon us by the phenomena, Goethe revealed our own free, creative contribution to theory construction. And Goethe's insight is surprisingly significant, because he correctly claimed that all of the results of Newton's prism experiments fit a theoretical alternative equally well. If this is correct, then by suggesting an alternative to a well-established physical theory, Goethe developed the problem of underdete...
Keywords Underdetermination  Colours  Light  Newton  Goethe  Quine  Color
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/09608788.2015.1132671
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 41,636
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Empirical Equivalence and Underdetermination.Larry Laudan & Jarrett Leplin - 1991 - Journal of Philosophy 88 (9):449-472.
Demystifying Underdetermination.Larry Laudan - 1990 - In C. Wade Savage (ed.), Scientific Theories. University of Minnesota Press. pp. 267-97.
Refusing the Devil's Bargain: What Kind of Underdetermination Should We Take Seriously?P. Kyle Stanford - 2001 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S1-.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Underdetermination and Provability: A Reply to Olaf Müller.Timm Lampert - 2017 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25 (2):389-400.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Ist Goethes Farbenlehre Wissenschaft?Gernot Böhme - 1977 - Studia Leibnitiana 9 (1):27 - 54.
Carnap's Demon.Lorenzo Baravalle - 2015 - Scientiae Studia 13 (1):223-232.
Theory of Science in the Light of Goethe's Science of Nature.Hjalmar Hegge - 1972 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 15 (1-4):363 – 386.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-02-17

Total views
36 ( #225,589 of 2,249,746 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #125,321 of 2,249,746 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature