Philosophical Review 107 (4):600 (1998)
AbstractProclus Platonic Academy) is undoubtedly one of the most influential figures in the history of western philosophy; his writings did more to shape pre-twentieth-century understandings of Plato than any other person. But today few students of ancient philosophy would cite Proclus as an authority on Plato, and only a few scholars and certain people whom many would identify as enthusiasts or mystics are likely to have read a whole work of Proclus, even in translation. And although there are some passages which can be read as original philosophical investigations, most notably—but perhaps this reflects my own philosophical interests—Proclus's discussion of the role of imagination in geometrical reasoning, even those passages have to be abstracted from their intellectual context to be made palatable to contemporary academic philosophical taste. The context is an elaborately triadic hierarchical metaphysics ranging between the limits of a One which is neither describable nor apprehensible because it is above being and a matter which is neither describable nor apprehensible because it is below being. But the metaphysics is also a representation of a pagan theology in which all the gods of fifth-century Greco-Roman religion find their place or places, and it is accompanied by a serious belief in practices standardly labeled magical.
Similar books and articles
Proclus L. Siorvanes: Proclus: Neo-Platonic Philosophy and Science. Pp. xv + 340, 1 map. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1996. £35. ISBN: 0-7486-70768-. [REVIEW]H. J. Blumenthal - 1998 - The Classical Review 48 (01):92-94.
Proclus: Neo-Platonic Philosophy and Science. L Siorvanes.H. J. Blumenthal - 1998 - The Classical Review 48 (1):92-94.
Lucas Siorvanes, Proclus. Neo-platonic philosophy and science. (Edinburgh: Edinburgh university press, 1996.) Pp. XII+340. £35 hb. [REVIEW]Lloyd P. Gerson - 1997 - Religious Studies 33 (4):473-484.
The Fragments That Remain of the Lost Writings of Proclus: Surnamed the Platonic Successor. Proclus - 1825 - Wizards Bookshelf.
Interpreting Proclus: From Antiquity to the Renaissance ed. by Stephen Gersh.Daniel O’Connell - 2016 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 54 (3):499-500.
Gaia gets to know herself: Proclus on the world's self-perception.Dirk Baltzly - 2009 - Phronesis 54 (3):261-285.
Proclus E. P. Bos, P. A. Meijer (edd.): On Proclus and his Influence in Medieval Philosophy. (Philosophia Antiqua, 53.) Pp. vii+206. Leiden, New York, Cologn: E. J. Brill, 1992. Cased, Fl. 100. [REVIEW]Lucas Siorvanes - 1994 - The Classical Review 44 (02):309-311.
Proclus. Neo-Platonic Philosophy and Science. [REVIEW]Lloyd P. Gerson - 1997 - Religious Studies 33 (4):473-484.
Proclus, Neo-Platonic Philosophy and Science.Stephen Gersh - 1997 - Review of Metaphysics 51 (2):445-446.
Proclus on Nature. Philosophy of Nature and its Methods in Proclus’ Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus.John Phillips - 2011 - International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 5 (2):329-334.
Proclus: Neo-Platonic Philosophy and Science (review).P. A. Meijer - 1999 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 37 (1):160-162.
Universality and Locality in Platonic Polytheism.Edward P. Butler - 2015 - Walking the Worlds: A Biannual Journal of Polytheism and Spiritwork 1 (2).
Proclus: Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus, part IV – Proclus on the World Soul. A translation with notes and introduction.Dirk Baltzly - 2009 - Cambridge University Press.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads