Philosophical Quarterly 19 (76):221-230 (1969)

Robert Muehlmann
University of Western Ontario
This paper consists of a thorough examination of the russell-Wittgenstein controversy over identity. The early wittgenstein's comments on this issue are cryptic and obscure; yet one thing is obvious. His views on identity are partly, If not wholly a negative response to russell's. In unearthing the source of the controversy, I distinguish several senses of 'identity'. I then examine several texts of russell's showing that he fails to make these necessary distinctions. I conclude by demonstrating that wittgenstein's comments are designed in part to rectify this mistake and in part to offer an illuminating analysis of his own
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/2218108
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,410
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Schmidentity and Informativity.Hannes Fraissler - 2020 - Synthese 198 (10):9963-9989.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
227 ( #50,435 of 2,519,698 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #406,314 of 2,519,698 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes