In Debating Equal Pay for All: Economy, Practicability and Ethics. Cham, Switzerland: pp. 21-35 (2021)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
The proposal on offer is a radical form of egalitarianism. Under it, each citizen receives the same income, regardless of profession or indeed whether he or she works or not. This proposal is bad for two reasons. First, it is inefficient. It would eliminate nearly all incentive to work, thereby shrinking national income and leaving all citizens poorly off (albeit equally poorly off). I illustrate this inefficiency via an indifference curve analysis. Second, the proposal would be regarded as unjust by almost everyone. The empirical work on justice makes this plain. Equal pay for equal work is desirable; equal pay no matter what is something else entirely. It is an idea not likely to find adherents.
|
Keywords | distributive justice economic efficiency deadweight loss desert indifference curves taxation |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Buy the book |
Find it on Amazon.com
|
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Chance, Merit, and Economic Inequality: Rethinking Distributive Justice and the Principle of Desert.Joseph de la Torre Dwyer - 2019 - Springer Verlag.
On the Idea of Distributive Justice in Marx.Liang-Chuan Tu & Hai-bo Hu - 2009 - Modern Philosophy 2:64-68.
Desert as Fit: An Axiomatic Analysis.Gustaf Arrhenius - 2006 - In Kris McDaniel, Jason R. Raibley, Richard Feldman & Michael E. Zimmerman (eds.), The Good, the Right, Life And Death: Essays in Honor of Fred Feldman. Aldershot: Ashgate Pub Co. pp. 3-17.
What's Wrong with Libertarianism: A Meritocratic Diagnosis.Thomas Mulligan - 2017 - In Jason Brennan, David Schmidtz & Bas van der Vossen (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Libertarianism. New York: Routledge. pp. 77-91.
From Bodo Ethics to Distributive Justice.Russell Hardin - 1999 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (4):399-413.
The Principle of Indifference and Imprecise Probability.Susanna Rinard - 2014 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 3 (2):110-114.
Why Distributive Justice Is Impossible but Contributive Justice Would Work.Paul Gomberg - 2016 - Science and Society 80 (1):31-55.
Distributive Justice and Economic Desert.Samuel Scheffler - 2003 - In Serena Olsaretti (ed.), Desert and Justice. Oxford University Press. pp. 69--92.
Fred Feldman, Distributive Justice: Getting What We Deserve From Our Country.Joseph Mendola - 2017 - Ethics 127 (4):929-934.
Criteria of Justice: Desert, Needs and Equality. [REVIEW]Richard J. Norman - 2001 - Res Publica 7 (2):115-136.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2021-01-09
Total views
238 ( #46,715 of 2,507,805 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
43 ( #20,356 of 2,507,805 )
2021-01-09
Total views
238 ( #46,715 of 2,507,805 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
43 ( #20,356 of 2,507,805 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads