Masks, mechanisms and Covid-19: the limitations of randomized trials in pandemic policymaking

History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 43 (2):1-5 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Reluctance to endorse mask wearing to slow transmission of SARS-Cov-2 has been rationalized by the failure of randomized control trials (RCTs) to provide supportive evidence. In contrast, a mechanism-based approach suggests that mask wearing should be expected to reduce transmission: so that contrary evidence from RCTs likely reflects the need to focus policy attention on addressing interacting or mediating factors that offset the basic positive effect. The differing conclusions that result from these two approaches reflect the limitations of RCT-based approaches that are compounded in scenarios, such as pandemics, where urgent decisions are required with limited evidence.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,925

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-03-26

Downloads
15 (#1,227,291)

6 months
4 (#1,231,713)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Seán M. Muller
University of Johannesburg

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Is meta-analysis the platinum standard of evidence?Jacob Stegenga - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 42 (4):497-507.

Add more references