The Tragedy of the Object: democracy of vision and the terrorism of things in bazin's cinematic realism

Angelaki 17 (4):39-59 (2012)

The ongoing duel between realist and anti-realist tendencies in film theory usually positions the ideas of André Bazin unambiguously on the realist side. Whatever else we expect to find in his writing – and the current resurgence is finding more and more – we should find this: realism, cinematic realism. But what type of realism? Is it ontological, and, if so, is it based on a claim for the primacy of photography's “analogical” relation to the world, even to the point of a “direct contact” with the physical existence of nature? Is it aesthetic, celebrating depth of field? Unaffected mise-en-scène? The documentary impulse in preference to fantasy or artifice? In this article, however, I want to argue that we must expand the definition of Bazinian realism through its sensitivity to the non-human. The terrain of the cinematic “Real” is inhabited by a singular complex, one that includes physical space, animality, and material objects, as well as persons and events. To shift our attention to these elements and their effects – intimate as well as alienating, familiar as well as jarring and unexpected – offers another way to glimpse the Real. Which is not to say that the socially constituted world drops out. Of course, language, gender and culture are inescapable mediations. Yet they are, in a certain sense, all wrought by a transcendent human hand. Bazin's conception of realism provides access to a space that is less anthropocentric and testifies to an immanence of the Real, such that non-human, objective realism is not about capturing reality in toto but registering the fact that the human is only a part of reality. There are realities beyond human subjectivity – in space, in objects, in animality – realities that we are put in contact with by cinema. Ideally, what cinema makes possible is an equality, a democratic freedom, not merely for the human spectator – to view and explore film worlds – but for the viewed “object” too: a democracy of the viewer-viewed that installs intersubjectivity in the Real.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/0969725x.2012.747329
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,122
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Cinematic Realism Revisited: A Kantian Perspective.D. Gamble - 2016 - Journal of Philosophical Research 41:499-526.
Cinematic Realism: A Defence From Plato to Gaut.Rafe McGregor - 2018 - British Journal of Aesthetics 58 (3):225-239.
External Realism About Cinematic Motion.Trevor Ponech - 2006 - British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (4):349-368.
Cinematic Realism.André Bazin - 2005 - In Thomas E. Wartenberg & Angela Curran (eds.), The Philosophy of Film: Introductory Text and Readings. Blackwell. pp. 59--69.
Veridical Hallucination.Tzu-Ying Lu - 2002 - Philosophy and Culture 29 (11):1040-1050.
Some Philosophical Issues of Film Theory.Noel Edward Carroll - 1983 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago
Anti-Realism or Pro-Something Else? Response to Deichsel.Tony Lawson - 2011 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 4 (1):53-66.


Added to PP index

Total views
25 ( #378,118 of 2,289,307 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #309,713 of 2,289,307 )

How can I increase my downloads?


Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes

Sign in to use this feature