Feminist Legal Studies 20 (3):189-206 (2012)

There has been an exponential rise in use of the term vulnerability across a number of political and policy arenas, including child protection, sexual offences, poverty, development, care for the elderly, patient autonomy, globalisation, war, public health and ecology. Yet despite its increasing deployment, the exact meaning and parameters of this concept remain somewhat elusive. In this article, we explore the interaction of two very different strategies—one in which vulnerability is relied upon by those seeking improved social justice as a mechanism by which to identify, problematise and compel state responses to a universal condition of precarious dependency, and the other in which it is used as a category of neo-liberal governance which legitimates state encroachment whilst constructing ‘vulnerable’ individuals as ‘risk-managers’ who must behave ‘responsibly’ in the face of disadvantage. We suggest that the co-existence of these divergent approaches highlights the fluidity and malleability of the concept of vulnerability. Using sex work as a specific case study, we explore the ways in which vulnerability bears multiple meanings, and has been used in recent times in the furtherance of moralistic and regressive agendas, which collude with, rather than challenge, state power. Without seeking to reject the label or normative import of vulnerability, we call, therefore, for a more circumspect approach to its usage, and a more critical evaluation of recent claims which hail it as a mechanism, preferable to the conventional use of equality paradigms, by which to secure progressive feminist outcomes.
Keywords Sex work  Vulnerability  Neo-liberalism  Feminism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10691-012-9213-x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,295
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Does the Rhetoric Work? Parental Responses to New Right Policy Assumptions.Pam Boulton & John Coldron - 1996 - British Journal of Educational Studies 44 (3):296 - 306.
‘Vulnerability’: Handle with Care.Kate Brown - 2011 - Ethics and Social Welfare 5 (3):313-321.
Contemporary Penality and Psychoanalysis.Amanda Matravers & Shadd Maruna - 2004 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 7 (2):118-144.
Introduction.Wendy Rogers - 2012 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 5 (2):1-10.
Hotep's Story: Exploring the Wounds of Health Vulnerability in the US.Ken Fox - 2002 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 23 (6):471-497.
A Feminist Interpretation of Vulnerability.Nancy J. Annaromao - 1996 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 3 (1):1-7.


Added to PP index

Total views
100 ( #107,549 of 2,448,747 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #302,300 of 2,448,747 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes