Theory and Decision 53 (3):187-207 (2002)

Abstract
This paper presents the results of a within-subject experiment testing whether an increase in the monetary stakes by a factor of 50 – which had never been done before – influences individual behavior in a simple ultimatum bargaining game. Contrary to current wisdom, we found that lowest acceptable offers stated by the responder are proportionally lower in the high-stake condition than in the low-stake condition. This result may be interpreted in terms of the type of utility functions which characterize the subjects. However, in line with prior results, we find that an important increase of the monetary stakes in the ultimatum game has no effect on the offers made by the proposer. Yet, the present research suggests that the reasons underlying these offers are quite different when the stakes are high
Keywords Experiment  Lowest acceptable offfers  Monetary stakes  Ultimatum
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1023/A:1022815832351
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,021
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Explaining Fairness in Complex Environments.Kevin J. S. Zollman - 2008 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (1):81-97.
Epistemic Anxiety and Adaptive Invariantism.Jennifer Nagel - 2010 - Philosophical Perspectives 24 (1):407-435.
What Does the Ultimatum Game Mean in the Real World?Randolph C. Grace & Simon Kemp - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):824-825.
Evolution and Ultimatum Bargaining.William Harms - 1997 - Theory and Decision 42 (2):147-175.
Evolutionary Considerations in the Framing of Social Norms.Brian Skyrms & Kevin J. S. Zollman - 2010 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 9 (3):265-273.
The Stakes Are Not Very High in This Game.Stuart J. Youngner - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (4):42 – 43.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-02

Total views
45 ( #230,448 of 2,433,538 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #468,801 of 2,433,538 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes