Pediatric Deep Brain Stimulation for Dystonia: Current State and Ethical Considerations

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 29 (4):557-573 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Dystonia is a movement disorder that can have a debilitating impact on motor functions and quality of life. There are 250,000 cases in the United States, most with childhood onset. Due to the limited effectiveness and side effects of available treatments, pediatric deep brain stimulation has emerged as an intervention for refractory dystonia. However, there is limited clinical and neuroethics research in this area of clinical practice. This paper examines whether it is ethically justified to offer pDBS to children with refractory dystonia. Given the favorable risk-benefit profile, it is concluded that offering pDBS is ethically justified for certain etiologies of dystonia, but it is less clear for others. In addition, various ethical and policy concerns are discussed, which need to be addressed to optimize the practice of offering pDBS for dystonia. Strategies are proposed to help address these concerns as pDBS continues to expand.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,389

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Building Intricate Partnerships with Neurotechnology: Deep Brain Stimulation and Relational Agency.Timothy Brown - 2020 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 13 (1):134-154.
The Gold-Plated Leucotomy Standard and Deep Brain Stimulation.Grant Gillett - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (1):35-44.
The Ethics of Deep Brain Stimulation.Marcus Unterrainer & Fuat S. Oduncu - 2015 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 18 (4):475-485.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-08

Downloads
7 (#1,036,224)

6 months
1 (#415,900)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?