Ethics and Information Technology 14 (2):109-121 (2012)
This paper argues that intellectual property rights are incompatible with Rawls’s principles of justice. This conclusion is based upon an analysis of the social stratification that emerges as a result of the patent mechanism which defines a marginalized group and ensure that its members remain alienated from the rights, benefits, and freedoms afforded by the patent product. This stratification is further complicated, so I argue, by the copyright mechanism that restricts and redistributes those rights already distributed by means of the patent mechanism. I argue that the positions of privilege established through both the patent and the copyright mechanisms are positions that do not “allow the most extensive liberty compatible with a like liberty for all.” They do not “benefit the least advantaged.” Nor are they “open to all under conditions of fair equality of opportunity.” In making this argument I critically assess the utilitarian defense of intellectual property rights and find it insufficient to respond to the injustices manifest in our current arrangement for the protection of intellectual property rights
|Keywords||Intellectual property rights Rawls Principles of justice Patent Copyright|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
A Theory of Justice.John Rawls - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Philosophy and Rhetoric. Oxford University Press. pp. 133-135.
The Morality of Software Piracy: A Cross-Cultural Analysis. [REVIEW]W. R. Swinyard, H. Rinne & A. Keng Kau - 1990 - Journal of Business Ethics 9 (8):655 - 664.
Is Music Downloading the New Prohibition? What Students Reveal Through an Ethical Dilemma.Shoshana Altschuller & Raquel Benbunan-Fich - 2009 - Ethics and Information Technology 11 (1):49-56.
Locke, Intellectual Property Rights, and the Information Commons.Herman T. Tavani - 2005 - Ethics and Information Technology 7 (2):87-97.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Liberalism and Intellectual Property Rights.Hugh Breakey - 2009 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (3):329-349.
Natural Intellectual Property Rights and the Public Domain.Hugh Breakey - 2010 - Modern Law Review 73 (2):208-239.
Intellectual Property, Copyright, and Fair Use in Education.Shaheen E. Lakhan & Meenakshi K. Khurana - 2008 - Cogprints.
Are Rawlsians Entitled to Monopoly Rights?Speranta Dumitru - 2008 - In A. Gosseries, A. Marciano & A. Strowel (eds.), Intelectual Property and Theories of Justice. Palgrave-MacMilan.
From the Wright Brothers to Microsoft: Issues in the Moral Grounding of Intellectual Property Rights.David Lea - 2006 - Business Ethics Quarterly 16 (4):579-598.
Intellectual Property Rights, Moral Imagination, and Access to Life-Enhancing Drugs.Michael Gorman - 2005 - Business Ethics Quarterly 15 (4):595-613.
Are Pharmaceutical Patents Protected by Human Rights?Joseph Millum - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (11):e25-e25.
Justice and Property: On the Institutional Thesis Concerning Property.Christopher Bertram - manuscript
Ideas, Expressions, Universals, and Particulars: Metaphysics in the Realm of Software Copyright Law.Thomas M. Powers - 2004 - In H. Tavani & R. Spinello (eds.), Intellectual Property Rights in a Networked World. Idea Group.
Added to index2012-02-08
Total downloads60 ( #87,251 of 2,168,630 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #82,721 of 2,168,630 )
How can I increase my downloads?