Evaluating the Source of the Risks Associated with Natural Events

Res Publica 17 (2):125-140 (2011)
Within philosophy there has been little discussion of the risks associated with natural events such as earthquakes. The first objective of this paper is to demonstrate why such risks should be the subject of more sustained philosophical interest. We argue that we cannot simply apply to risks associated with natural events those insights and frameworks for moral evaluation developed in the literature considering ordinary risks, technological risks and the risks posed by anthropogenic climate change. The second objective of this paper is to identify and develop a framework for the moral evaluation of the source of the risks associated with natural events, or the actions which sustain and impact such risks. Our discussion concentrates on the ways the construction and modification of built and natural environments can alter the probability of occurrence of natural events and the character and magnitude of the impact that such events have. We then argue for the need to develop a standard of reasonable care for decisions about the built and modified natural environment, which accounts for technical and resource constraints, as well as the place of natural hazard mitigation in public policy
Keywords Risk  Natural disasters  Engineering  Standard of care
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11158-010-9136-9
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,392
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Sven Ove Hansson (2004). Philosophical Perspectives on Risk. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 8 (1):10-35.
Maarten Franssen (2010). Philosophy of Technology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
John Oberdiek (2009). Towards a Right Against Risking. Law and Philosophy 28 (4):367 - 392.

View all 27 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Per Sandin (2005). Naturalness and de Minimis Risk. Environmental Ethics 27 (2):191-200.
Douglas MacLean (1982). Quantification, Regulation, and Risk Assessment. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:243 - 260.
Thomas Heyd (2008). Culture and Climate Change. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 23:45-52.
John T. Sanders (1996). Risk and Value. A.S.V.I. News 1996 (Spring):4-5.
Heidi Storl (1993). The Risks of Going Natural. Southwest Philosophy Review 9 (1):23-33.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

36 ( #133,494 of 1,924,682 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #254,655 of 1,924,682 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.