Evaluating the Source of the Risks Associated with Natural Events

Res Publica 17 (2):125-140 (2011)
Abstract
Within philosophy there has been little discussion of the risks associated with natural events such as earthquakes. The first objective of this paper is to demonstrate why such risks should be the subject of more sustained philosophical interest. We argue that we cannot simply apply to risks associated with natural events those insights and frameworks for moral evaluation developed in the literature considering ordinary risks, technological risks and the risks posed by anthropogenic climate change. The second objective of this paper is to identify and develop a framework for the moral evaluation of the source of the risks associated with natural events, or the actions which sustain and impact such risks. Our discussion concentrates on the ways the construction and modification of built and natural environments can alter the probability of occurrence of natural events and the character and magnitude of the impact that such events have. We then argue for the need to develop a standard of reasonable care for decisions about the built and modified natural environment, which accounts for technical and resource constraints, as well as the place of natural hazard mitigation in public policy
Keywords Risk  Natural disasters  Engineering  Standard of care
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11158-010-9136-9
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,865
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Philosophical Perspectives on Risk.Sven Ove Hansson - 2004 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 8 (1):10-35.
Climate Change and the Future: Discounting for Time, Wealth, and Risk.Simon Caney - 2009 - Journal of Social Philosophy 40 (2):163-186.
Towards a Right Against Risking.John Oberdiek - 2009 - Law and Philosophy 28 (4):367 - 392.

View all 29 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Naturalness and de Minimis Risk.Per Sandin - 2005 - Environmental Ethics 27 (2):191-200.
Quantification, Regulation, and Risk Assessment.Douglas MacLean - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:243 - 260.
Culture and Climate Change.Thomas Heyd - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 23:45-52.
Risk and Value.John T. Sanders - 1996 - A.S.V.I. News 1996 (Spring):4-5.
Assessment of Strategies for Evaluating Extreme Risks.James Franklin & Scott Sisson - 2007 - Australian Centre of Excellence for Risk Analysis Reports.
The Risks of Going Natural.Heidi Storl - 1993 - Southwest Philosophy Review 9 (1):23-33.
Added to PP index
2010-12-10

Total downloads
39 ( #144,835 of 2,210,740 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #394,854 of 2,210,740 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature