Health Care Analysis 8 (2):155-169 (2000)
This article surveys a range of recent media storiesabout human gametes, pinning them to a series of widerpreoccupations within late modern life. Threepreoccupations are singled out: first, kinship andrelational identity; secondly, Nature andglobalisation; and finally, sexual difference andequality. Each one of these preoccupations has beencharacterised as iconic; debates about them are saidto crystallise who we are, especially ouruncertainties, and what we will be in the future. Byindexing these preoccupations to the stories abouthuman gametes, the article aims to upset both theincreasing attempts to present assisted reproductiontechnologies as `familiar' (as Nature's `helpinghand', for example) and the recurringassumptions about this technology's alleged`novelty' and `anomaly'. The article concludesthat treating reproduction technologies, and theirregulation, as `familiar' risks complacency:equally, assumptions about their `novelty' narrowsthe search for effective explanatory tools andregulatory mechanisms. The upshot is that it might bebest for us to view reproductive technologies as bothless `familiar' and less `novel'
|Keywords||gametes globalisation identity kinship law nature sexual difference|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Does Respect for Embryos Entail Respect for Gametes?Alfonso Gómez-Lobo - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (3):199-208.
Reproductive and Therapeutic Cloning, Germline Therapy, and Purchase of Gametes and Embryos: Comments on Canadian Legislation Governing Reproduction Technologies.L. Bernier - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (6):527-532.
On Heresy in Modern Patristic Scholarship: The Case of Evagrius Ponticus.Augustine Casiday - 2012 - Heythrop Journal 53 (2):241-252.
Commentary: Posthumous Harvesting of Gametes ? A Physician's Perspective.Michael R. Soules - 1999 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 27 (4):362-365.
Interstate Intercourse: How Modern Assisted Reproductive Technologies Challenge the Traditional Realm of Conflicts of Law.Sonia Bychkov Green - unknown
Legal Responses to Some of the New Developments in Reproductive Technologies Part.3 The Future of Reproductive Technologies and the Law.Andrew Scott - 2002 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 8 (2):24 - 28.
Frozen Embryos, Genetic Information and Reproductive Rights.Sarah Chan & Muireann Quigley - 2007 - Bioethics 21 (8):439–448.
Biomedicine, the Family, and Human Rights.Marie Thérèse Meulders-Klein, Ruth Deech & P. Vlaardingerbroek (eds.) - 2002 - Kluwer Law International.
The Texture of Reproductive Choice : Law, Ethnography, and Reproductive Technologies.Thérèse Murphy - 2009 - In New Technologies and Human Rights. Oxford University Press.
Contested Commodities at Both Ends of Life: Buying and Selling Gametes, Embryos, and Body Tissues.Suzanne Holland - 2001 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 (3):263-284.
Splendid Vices and Secular Virtues: Variations on Milbank's Augustine.James Wetzel - 2004 - Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (2):271 - 300.
Third Party Assisted Conception: An African Perspective.Godfrey B. Tangwa - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (5):297-306.
Sharing Responsibility in Gamete Donation: Balancing Relations and New Knowledge in Latvia.Signe Mezinska, Ilze Mileiko & Aivita Putnina - 2012 - Medicine Studies 3 (3):185-196.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads3 ( #687,900 of 2,154,168 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #397,226 of 2,154,168 )
How can I increase my downloads?