- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
God's Own Ethics: Norms of Divine Agency and the Argument From Evil
New York: Oxford University Press (2017)
Abstract
Mark C. Murphy addresses the question of how God's ethics differs from human ethics. Murphy suggests that God is not subject to the moral norms to which we humans are subject. This has immediate implications for the argument from evil: we cannot assume that an absolutely perfect being is in any way bound to prevent the evils of this world.Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Mark C. Murphy, God’s Own Ethics: Norms of Divine Agency and the Argument from Evil. [REVIEW]Nevin Climenhaga - 2020 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 17 (5):587-590.
God’s Own Ethics: Norms of Divine Agency and the Argument from Evil, by Mark C. Murphy. [REVIEW]Kyla Ebels-Duggan - 2019 - Faith and Philosophy 36 (1):144-150.
Mark C. Murphy, God's Own Ethics: Norms of Divine Agency and the Argument from Evil. Reviewed by. [REVIEW]Mark Satta - 2018 - Philosophy in Review 38 (2):73-75.
Mark Murphy. God’s Own Ethics: Norms of Divine Agency & the Argument from Evil.Christian B. Miller - 2020 - Journal of Analytic Theology 8 (1):726-729.
God and Moral Law: On the Theistic Explanation of Morality.Mark C. Murphy - 2011 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Murphy's Anselmian theism and the problem of evil.Luke Wilson - 2024 - Religious Studies 60 (4):549-563.
Divine Satisficing and the Ethics of the Problem of Evil.Chris Tucker - 2020 - Faith and Philosophy 37 (1):32-56.
Mark C. Murphy: God’s own ethics: Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2017, 210 pp, $70.00. [REVIEW]Scott M. Coley - 2018 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 84 (3):355-360.
The Evidential Argument From Evil in Recent Analytic Philosophy.Edward Ned Martin - 1995 - Dissertation, Purdue University
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-05-18
Downloads
58 (#363,216)
6 months
12 (#274,581)
2017-05-18
Downloads
58 (#363,216)
6 months
12 (#274,581)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
If We Can’t Tell What Theism Predicts, We Can’t Tell Whether God Exists: Skeptical Theism and Bayesian Arguments from Evil.Nevin Climenhaga - forthcoming - Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion.
How to Solve the Problem of Evil: A Deontological Strategy.Justin Mooney - 2019 - Faith and Philosophy 36 (4):442-462.
God and gratuitous evil: Between the rock and the hard place.Luis R. G. Oliveira - 2023 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 94 (3):317-345.
How Valuable Could a Person Be?Joshua Rasmussen & Andrew M. Bailey - 2020 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 103 (2):264-277.
Intrinsically Good, God Created Them.Daniel Rubio - forthcoming - Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7f8ff5d46-lkplx uwo