In Defense of Prenatal Genetic Interventions

Bioethics 28 (7):335-342 (2014)
Abstract
Jürgen Habermas has argued against prenatal genetic interventions used to influence traits on the grounds that only biogenetic contingency in the conception of children preserves the conditions that make the presumption of moral equality possible. This argument fails for a number of reasons. The contingency that Habermas points to as the condition of moral equality is an artifact of evolutionary contingency and not inviolable in itself. Moreover, as a precedent for genetic interventions, parents and society already affect children's traits, which is to say there is moral precedent for influencing the traits of descendants. A veil-of-ignorance methodology can also be used to justify prenatal interventions through its method of advance consent and its preservation of the contingency of human identities in a moral sense. In any case, the selection of children's traits does not undermine the prospects of authoring a life since their future remains just as contingent morally as if no trait had been selected. Ironically, the prospect of preserving human beings as they are – to counteract genetic drift – might even require interventions to preserve the ability to author a life in a moral sense. In light of these analyses, Habermas' concerns about prenatal genetic interventions cannot succeed as objections to their practice as a matter of principle; the merits of these interventions must be evaluated individually
Keywords prenatal testing  sex selection  ethics  eugenics  genetic interventions
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.02009.x
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,224
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Genetic Modifications for Personal Enhancement: A Defense.Timothy F. Murphy - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics (4):2012-101026.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Virtue Ethics and Prenatal Genetic Enhancement.Colin Farrelly - 2007 - Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 1 (1).
Choosing Disabilities and Enhancements in Children: A Choice Too Far?Timothy F. Murphy - 2009 - Reproductie Biomedicine Online 2009 (18 sup. 1):43-49.
Ethics and Eugenic Enhancement.Michael J. Selgelid - 2003 - Poiesis and Praxis 1 (4):239-261.
Autonomy and Freedom of Choice in Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis.Elisabeth Hildt - 2002 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (1):65-72.
Genetic Counseling and Termination of Pregnancy in Hungary.Zoltan Papp - 1989 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (3):323-333.
Genes and Equality.Colin Farrelly - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (6):587-592.
The Genetic Difference Principle.Colin Farrelly - 2004 - American Journal of Bioethics 4 (2):21 – 28.
Added to PP index
2012-10-02

Total downloads
20 ( #253,727 of 2,191,999 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #144,931 of 2,191,999 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature