Philosophical Studies 149 (2):269-281 (2010)

Authors
Julien Murzi
University of Salzburg
Abstract
In this paper, I focus on some intuitionistic solutions to the Paradox of Knowability. I first consider the relatively little discussed idea that, on an intuitionistic interpretation of the conditional, there is no paradox to start with. I show that this proposal only works if proofs are thought of as tokens, and suggest that anti-realists themselves have good reasons for thinking of proofs as types. In then turn to more standard intuitionistic treatments, as proposed by Timothy Williamson and, most recently, Michael Dummett. Intuitionists can either point out the intuitionistc invalidity of the inference from the claim that all truths are knowable to the insane conclusion that all truths are known, or they can outright demur from asserting the existence of forever-unknown truths, perhaps questioning—as Dummett now suggests—the applicability of the Principle of Bivalence to a certain class of empirical statements. I argue that if intuitionists reject strict finitism—the view that all truths are knowable by beings just like us—the prospects for either proposal look bleak.
Keywords Paradox of Knowability  Semantic anti-realism  Bivalence  Idealisation  Intuitionistic conditional
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-009-9349-y
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,554
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Knowledge and its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
The Epistemology of Abstract Objects: Access and Inference.David Bell & W. D. Hart - 1979 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes( 53:135-165.
The Taming of the True.Neil Tennant - 1997 - Oxford University Press.
Truth and the Past.Michael Dummett - 2004 - Columbia University Press.
Wang's Paradox.Michael Dummett - 1975 - Synthese 30 (3-4):201--32.

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Intuitionistic epistemic logic.Sergei Artemov & Tudor Protopopescu - 2016 - Review of Symbolic Logic 9 (2):266-298.
Conditionals in Interaction.James Trafford - 2017 - Studia Humana 6 (1):39-49.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Not Every Truth Can Be Known (at Least, Not All at Once).Greg Restall - 2009 - In Joe Salerno (ed.), New Essays on the Knowability Paradox. Oxford University Press. pp. 339--354.
New Essays on the Knowability Paradox.Joe Salerno (ed.) - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
The Paradox of Knowability and Factivity.Michael Shaffer - 2014 - Polish Journal of Philiosophy 8 (1):85-91.
Knowability and the Capacity to Know.Author unknown - manuscript
The Mystery of the Disappearing Diamond.C. S. Jenkins - 2009 - In Joe Salerno (ed.), New Essays on the Knowability Paradox. Oxford University Press. pp. 302--319.
Truth and the Enigma of Knowability.Bernhard Weiss - 2007 - Dialectica 61 (4):521–537.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-02-23

Total views
71 ( #130,316 of 2,331,151 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #589,978 of 2,331,151 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes