On Fodor's First Law of the Nonexistence of Cognitive Science

Cognitive Science 43 (5):e12735 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In his enormously influential The Modularity of Mind, Jerry Fodor (1983) proposed that the mind was divided into input modules and central processes. Much subsequent research focused on the modules and whether processes like speech perception or spatial vision are truly modular. Much less attention has been given to Fodor's writing on the central processes, what would today be called higher‐level cognition. In “Fodor's First Law of the Nonexistence of Cognitive Science,” he argued that central processes are “bad candidates for scientific study” and would resist attempts at empirical analysis. This essay evaluates his argument for this remarkable claim, concluding that although central processes may well be “messier” than input modules, this does not mean that they cannot be studied and understood. The article briefly reviews the scientific progress made in understanding central processes in the 35 years since the book was published, showing that Fodor's prediction is clearly falsified by massive advances in topics like decision making and analogy. The essay concludes that Fodor's Law was not based on a clear argument for why the complexities of central systems could not be studied but was likely based on intuitions and preferences that were common in psychology at the time.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Fodor: Language, Mind and Philosophy.Mark J. Cain - 2002 - Malden, MA: Polity Press.
On Fodor's The Mind Doesn't Work That Way.Daniel A. Weiskopf - 2002 - Philosophical Psychology 15 (4):551-562.
Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong.Jerry A. Fodor - 1998 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Fodor's concepts.James T. Higginbotham - 1995 - In Philosophical Issues. Atascadero: Ridgeview. pp. 25-37.
Fodor and Pylyshyn on connectionism.Michael V. Antony - 1991 - Minds and Machines 1 (3):321-41.
Modularity and Mental Architecture.Philip Robbins - 2013 - WIREs Cognitive Science 4 (6):641-648.
Nonexistence without nonexistents.Arnold Cusmariu - 1978 - Philosophical Studies 33 (4):409-412.
Brueckner and Fischer on the Evil of Death.Huiyuhl Yi - 2012 - Philosophia 40 (2):295-303.
Yes, it does: A diatribe on Jerry Fodor's the mind doesn't work that way.Susan Schneider - 2007 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness.


Added to PP

22 (#692,982)

6 months
6 (#512,819)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Modularity of Mind.Robert Cummins & Jerry Fodor - 1983 - Philosophical Review 94 (1):101.
The Language of Thought.J. A. Fodor - 1978 - Critica 10 (28):140-143.
The weirdest people in the world?Joseph Henrich, Steven J. Heine & Ara Norenzayan - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3):61-83.
Experimental Psychology.Robert S. Woodworth - 1940 - Mind 49 (193):63-72.

View all 24 references / Add more references