Published online at essays in philosophy 6 (2005) Murphy, page 1 of

Abstract
The book has two parts. The first looks at the destructive use to which Descartes puts the method of doubt. But this is just half the story since, according to Broughton, Descartes also uses the method of doubt constructively. The second part of the book takes up the constructive use. Both uses fit into an overarching claim that is set out in the introduction. According to this claim, Descartes employs the method of doubt in order to establish fundamental metaphysical claims – or, as he says, claims of first philosophy (recall Descartes’s title: Meditations on First Philosophy). These include: God exists, we ought to assent only to what we clearly and distinctly perceive, the essential attribute of matter is extension, the essential attribute of the human mind is thought, and sense experience allows us to know the primary qualities of material objects. This metaphysical interpretation of the method’s aim is contrasted with others: that the aim is to secure some form of high-grade knowledge, to clear the way for Descartes’s mechanistic physics, to refute the skepticism of the day, and to free the mind from the senses so we can think better about supersensible entities. Broughton cites passages in support of each interpretation. As her survey shows, there is (at least) decent textual support for each interpretation. Perhaps then the method of doubt is multi-purposed. After all, there is no obvious incompatibility between any two or more of the aims – so why take the various interpretations as competing with one another? Unfortunately, Broughton doesn’t say.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,719
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Descartes' Method of Doubt.Janet Broughton - 2002 - Princeton University Press.
Cartesian Analysis and Synthesis.A. Raftopoulos - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (2):265-308.
Descartes, the Cartesian Circle, and Epistemology Without God.Rocca Michael Della - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (1):1–33.
Almog's Descartes.Fred Ablondi - 2005 - Philosophy 80 (3):423-431.
Rocking the Foundations of Cartesian Knowledge.Lex Newman - 2004 - Philosophical Review 113 (1):101-125.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
24 ( #217,811 of 2,197,287 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #299,052 of 2,197,287 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature