Journal of Global Ethics 13 (1):28-39 (2017)

Colleen Murphy
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Nir Eisikovits argues in A Theory of Truces that most contemporary conflicts wind down in a much more piecemeal fashion than our theorizing about the morality of ending wars suggests. Pauses in violence are achieved by securing agreement on narrow questions. Moreover, rather than hoping to do away with violence, theorizing would do best, he writes, to take as its starting point the fact of warfare as part of the human condition. Eisikovits aims to articulate the features of truce thinking, a framework that is more descriptively accurate and normatively useful in navigating contemporary conflicts and promoting reconciliation. After summarizing his view, I argue that Eisikovits’ explanation of the contribution of truces to political reconciliation is too narrow; contrary to what he claims, truces can make an important contribution to the rule of law. I also challenge Eisikovits’ characterization of the first feature of truce thinking. I argue that while there is an important present focus on immediate benefits from temporary measures, the future looms much larger than Eisikovits recognizes. Truces matter not only for what they make possible now, but also for their ramifications for prospects for future peace. These ramifications go beyond creating conditions for hope or optimism.
Keywords truce  reconciliation  just war theory  rule of law
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/17449626.2017.1324509
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,047
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Human Interaction and the Law.Lon L. Fuller - 1969 - American Journal of Jurisprudence 14 (1):1-36.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Truce Thinking and Just War Theory.Keith Breen - 2017 - Journal of Global Ethics 13 (1):14-27.
Not Just War: Eisikovits on A Theory of Truces.Thom Brooks - 2017 - Journal of Global Ethics 13 (1):4-5.
Jus Interruptus Bellum: The Ethics of Truce-Making.Thaddeus Metz - 2017 - Journal of Global Ethics 13 (1):6-13.
Transitional Justice and Equality: A Response to Eisikovits.Jamie Terence Kelly - 2010 - Review of International Affairs 61 (1138-1139):190-196.
Seeing Sympathy: Remarks on Sympathizing with the Enemy.Alice MacLachlan - 2010 - Review of International Affairs 61 (1138-39):178-189.
The Values of Political Reconciliation. [REVIEW]Alice MacLachlan - 2012 - Transnational Legal Theory 3 (1):95-100.
International Criminal Courts and Political Reconciliation.Tracy Isaacs - 2016 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 10 (1):133-142.
The Nature and Moral Importance of Political Reconciliation.Colleen Murphy - 2004 - Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill


Added to PP index

Total views
15 ( #621,984 of 2,344,283 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #513,994 of 2,344,283 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes