Can external claims of randomised evaluations used in Developmental Economics be considered knowledge, in light of the problem of induction?
The usage of Randomised Evaluations(REs) in social inquiry has been recent and responses to them have been wide ranging.RE seek to make predictions on the impact of an intervention, when it is attempted in a new situation. REs work by first determining the impact of the intervention. Subsequently, for the new situation it is expected that the impact would be similar. The problem of induction poses one of the most serious challenges to the epistemological status of RE claims as the value of REs themselve stem from their predictive validity. If the problem of induction is not solved or evaded then belief in projections based on REs is undermined. In this paper, I argue that the unique methodology of REs used in Social Sciences allows itself to evade the problem the successfully, warranting belief that future interventions would have similar impact.
|Keywords||randomized evaluations social science problem of induction developmental economics probability law of large numbers economics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Value Judgements and Value Neutrality in Economics.Philippe Mongin - 2006 - Economica 73 (290):257-286.
Can Rationalist Abductivism Solve the Problem of Induction?James Beebe - 2008 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89 (2):151-168.
Counterfactual Conditionals and the Presuppositions of Induction.William Todd - 1964 - Philosophy of Science 31 (2):101-110.
The Old Problem of Induction and the New Reflective Equilibrium.Jared Bates - 2005 - Dialectica 59 (3):347–356.
An Introduction to Probability and Inductive Logic.Ian Hacking - 2001 - Cambridge University Press.
Two Problems of Induction.John O'Neill - 1989 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (1):121-125.
Beauty in Science: A New Model of the Role of Aesthetic Evaluations in Science. [REVIEW]Ulianov Montano - 2013 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 3 (2):133-156.
On Not Changing the Problem: A Reply to Howson.Daniel Steel - 2011 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (3):285 - 291.
Modern and Postmodern Challenges to Game Theory.Yanis Varoufakis - 1993 - Erkenntnis 38 (3):371 - 404.
Explanationist Aid for the Theory of Inductive Logic.Michael Huemer - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (2):345-375.
A Material Dissolution of the Problem of Induction.John D. Norton - 2013 - Synthese 191 (4):1-20.
How Popper [Might Have] Solved the Problem of Induction.Alan Musgrave - 2004 - Philosophy 79 (1):19-31.
Added to index2012-04-06
Total downloads57 ( #89,442 of 2,152,226 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #162,767 of 2,152,226 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.