One, two, or many mechanisms? The brain's processing of complex words

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1031-1032 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The heated debate over whether there is only a single mechanism or two mechanisms for morphology has diverted valuable research energy away from the more critical questions about the neural computations involved in the comprehension and production of morphologically complex forms. Cognitive neuroscience data implicate many brain areas. All extant models, whether they rely on a connectionist network or espouse two mechanisms, are too underspecified to explain why more than a few brain areas differ in their activity during the processing of regular and irregular forms. No one doubts that the brain treats regular and irregular words differently, but brain data indicate that a simplistic account will not do. It is time for us to search for the critical factors free from theoretical blinders.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
18 (#859,738)

6 months
2 (#1,259,626)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matthew Thomas
University College London

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references