Moore's paradox of analysis

Metaphilosophy 2 (4):295–308 (1971)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The nature of conceptual analysis is elucidated by a proposed solution to moore's paradox of analysis. Occurrent, Dispositional, And property concepts are distinguished, And the notion of epistemic gain is introduced and explained. It is shown that although a correct analysis equates property concepts this is done with epistemic gain. It is argued that in a correct analysis there must be no identity between analysans and analysandum in respect to occurrent concepts. The relevance of thought experiments to conceptual analysis is discussed and it is concluded that conceptual analysis consists of a transformation of knowledge how into knowledge that

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A semantic resolution of the paradox of analysis.Dennis Earl - 2007 - Acta Analytica 22 (3):189-205.
Justification and Moore's paradox.Anthony Brueckner - 2006 - Analysis 66 (3):264–266.
Justification and Moore's paradox.A. Brueckner - 2006 - Analysis 66 (3):264-266.
Analysis in the Philosophy of G. E. Moore.Frank Dominic Ferrara - 1980 - Dissertation, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale
A Fregean Solution to the Paradox of Analysis.Dale Jacquette - 1990 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 37 (1):59-73.
A Fregean Solution to the Paradox of Analysis.Dale Jacquette - 1990 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 37 (1):59-73.
Vague Analysis.Dennis Earl - 2010 - Metaphysica 11 (2):223-233.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
12 (#317,170)

6 months
124 (#143,894)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

A proof that synthetic a priori propositions exist.C. H. Langford - 1949 - Journal of Philosophy 46 (1):20-24.

Add more references