Authors
Daniel D. Hutto
University of Wollongong
Abstract
We address some frequently encountered criticisms of Radical Embodied/Enactive Cognition. Contrary to the claims that the position is too radical, or not sufficiently so, we claim REC is just radical enough.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1515/slgr-2015-0020
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,194
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Varieties of Reference.Gareth Evans - 1982 - Oxford University Press.
The Varieties of Reference.Louise M. Antony - 1987 - Philosophical Review 96 (2):275.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

An exploration into enactive forms of forgetting.Marta Caravà - 2020 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 20 (4):703-722.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Radical Embodied Cognitive Science.Erik Myin - 2012 - Philosophical Psychology 25 (2):295 - 299.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-07-27

Total views
21 ( #513,640 of 2,448,338 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #450,727 of 2,448,338 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes