Anti-Aging is not Necessarily Anti-Death: Bioethics and the Front Lines of Practice [Book Review]

Medicine Studies 1 (3):209-228 (2009)
Anti-aging medicine has emerged in the past two decades as both a medical practice and scientific objective largely aimed at intervening into the process of aging itself rather than its “associated” diseases. This has provoked a both excitement and concern in bioethical deliberations on the meaning and potential impact of an effective intervention. In this article, I examine the different ways in which bioethicists, other social scientists, and anti-aging proponents frame anti-aging goals, in particular, the construction of immortality as its implicit and explicit aim. This research is based upon over 9 years of anthropological, ethnographic interview- and observation-based research in the field and draws substantially from the US President’s Council on Bioethics’ deliberations on this topic as well as from interview data and other publications/discussion on anti-aging medicine. I argue that while the framework of life and death provide the primary structure for many bioethical and social science critiques of anti-aging medicine, many if not most anti-aging practitioners, researchers, and advocates employ the alternative structure of health and pain to orient their work. These divergent orientations of life/death and health/pain beget competing conversations around anti-aging medicine; including voices from the front lines of anti-aging practice complicate bioethical critiques and ultimately beg different questions. Positioning the painful, physiological decline of aging as the ultimate adversary rather than death challenges traditional models of biomedical intervention based on “nature” and “disease” constructions
Keywords Anti-aging medicine  Death  Immortality  Health  Pain  President’s Council on Bioethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s12376-009-0026-4
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,694
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Listening to Prozac.Peter D. Kramer - 1994 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 37 (3):460.
Making PCR: A Story of Biotechnology.Paul Rabinow - 1998 - Journal of the History of Biology 31 (1):143-145.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
A Cure for Aging?Timothy F. Murphy - 1986 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11 (3):237-255.
Anti-Symmetry and Non-Extensional Mereology.Aaron J. Cotnoir - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (239):396-405.
Anti-Democratic Thought.Erich Kofmel (ed.) - 2008 - Imprint Academic.
What Would John Dewey Do? The Promises and Perils of Pragmatic Bioethics.Christopher Tollefsen - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (1):77 – 106.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
12 ( #389,132 of 2,197,244 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #148,863 of 2,197,244 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature