Medicine Studies 1 (3):209-228 (2009)
Anti-aging medicine has emerged in the past two decades as both a medical practice and scientific objective largely aimed at intervening into the process of aging itself rather than its “associated” diseases. This has provoked a both excitement and concern in bioethical deliberations on the meaning and potential impact of an effective intervention. In this article, I examine the different ways in which bioethicists, other social scientists, and anti-aging proponents frame anti-aging goals, in particular, the construction of immortality as its implicit and explicit aim. This research is based upon over 9 years of anthropological, ethnographic interview- and observation-based research in the field and draws substantially from the US President’s Council on Bioethics’ deliberations on this topic as well as from interview data and other publications/discussion on anti-aging medicine. I argue that while the framework of life and death provide the primary structure for many bioethical and social science critiques of anti-aging medicine, many if not most anti-aging practitioners, researchers, and advocates employ the alternative structure of health and pain to orient their work. These divergent orientations of life/death and health/pain beget competing conversations around anti-aging medicine; including voices from the front lines of anti-aging practice complicate bioethical critiques and ultimately beg different questions. Positioning the painful, physiological decline of aging as the ultimate adversary rather than death challenges traditional models of biomedical intervention based on “nature” and “disease” constructions
|Keywords||Anti-aging medicine Death Immortality Health Pain President’s Council on Bioethics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Laboratory Life; The Construction of Scientific Facts.Bruno Latour & Steven Woolgar - 1986 - Princeton University Press.
The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science.K. Knorr-Cetina - 1981 - Pergamon Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Equalising Opportunities, Minimising Oppression: A Critical Review of Anti-Discriminatory Policies in Health and Social Welfare.Dylan Ronald Tomlinson & Winston Trew (eds.) - 2002 - Routledge.
Antirealism, Theism and the Conditional Fallacy.Berit Brogaard & Joe Salerno - 2005 - Noûs 39 (1):123–139.
Anti-Aging and Biomedicine: Critical Studies on the Pursuit of Maintaining, Revitalizing and Enhancing Aging Bodies. [REVIEW]Antje Kampf & Lynn Botelho - 2009 - Medicine Studies 1 (3):187-195.
Anti-Symmetry and Non-Extensional Mereology.Aaron J. Cotnoir - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (239):396-405.
Philosophy on Steroids: Why the Anti-Doping Position Could Use a Little Enhancement.Brent M. Kious - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (4):213-234.
What Would John Dewey Do? The Promises and Perils of Pragmatic Bioethics.Christopher Tollefsen - 2000 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (1):77 – 106.
Dreaming, Calculating, Thinking: Wittgenstein and Anti-Realism About the Past.William Child - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (227):252–272.
Death And Anti-Death, Volume 7: Nine Hundred Years After St. Anselm (1033-1109.Charles Tandy (ed.) - 2010 - Ria University Press.
Death and Anti-Death, Volume 7: Nine Hundred Years After St. Anselm (1033-1109).R. Michael Perry - 2009 - Ria University Press.
Added to index2011-11-26
Total downloads10 ( #413,445 of 2,126,928 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #293,382 of 2,126,928 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.