Is there any evidence for forward modeling in language production?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (4):368-369 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The neurocognitive evidence that Pickering & Garrod (P&G) cite in favor of positing forward models in speech production is not compelling. The data to which they appeal either cannot be explained by forward models, or can be explained by a more parsimonious model

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Revealing the language of thought.Brent Silby - 2024 - Christchurch: Amazon.
Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue.Martin J. Pickering & Simon Garrod - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):169-190.
Modeling in Philosophy of Science.Stephan Hartmann - 2008 - In W. K. Essler & M. Frauchiger (eds.), Representation, Evidence, and Justification: Themes From Suppes. Frankfort, Germany: Ontos Verlag. pp. 1-95.
Trickle-up phonetics: A vocal role for the infant.John L. Locke - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):516-516.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
38 (#422,001)

6 months
12 (#220,085)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Myrto Mylopoulos
Carleton University
David Pereplyotchik
Kent State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Monitoring and self-repair in speech.W. Levelt - 1983 - Cognition 14 (1):41-104.

Add more references