In this chapter I want to take up some of the problems that must be faced by any defender of the objectivity of ethics who wishes to make sense of the actual complexity of the subject. The treatment will be general and very incomplete. Essentially I shall discuss some examples in order to suggest that the enterprise is not hopeless.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Deontology and Defeat.Michael Bergmann - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (1):87-102.
Axiology, Deontology, and Agent Morality: The Need for Coordination. [REVIEW]Lawrence C. Becker - 1972 - Journal of Value Inquiry 6 (3):213-220.
Deontology and the Agent: A Reply to Jonathan Bennett.Samuel Scheffler - 1989 - Ethics 100 (1):67-76.
Relativity of Value and the Consequentialist Umbrella.Jennie Louise - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (217):518–536.
A Logic Road From Special to General Relativity.Hajnal Andréka, Judit X. Madarász, István Németi & Gergely Székely - unknown
The Epistemological Foundations of Artificial Agents.Nicola Lacey & M. Lee - 2003 - Minds and Machines 13 (3):339-365.
Combining Teleological Ethics with Evaluator Relativism: A Promising Result.Douglas W. Portmore - 2005 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (1):95–113.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads256 ( #13,483 of 2,177,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #45,332 of 2,177,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?